IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6, was IPv10

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 29 December 2016 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48DB129890 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:56:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=DQ538uil; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=aG92QVeZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BqgYrgldQt21 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC8312007C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 31714 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2016 23:56:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7be1.5865a2b1.k1612; bh=QsfAAXhJiK7bPK4W6dga1j47YA/am3kZhrneieFS/zY=; b=DQ538uilYM7p1bnPqlqMb3ztN0Nva93RkzCyUaCjbQe5JXlCP7c4HKJFAh/mNdqAuKuUR01TNpdaou2cMRLokZohAAgIoiknYFv6SJpzVEVvyGcsIVdrBSoNB400ZQu5y5qJNbAi0RfGQ2O/Ws2sPDCVuhopWP9cocmyZQCFv/Y44r3gDB4NI8/Sp5G6lHGZaq5HTOCeiunuPUTAx1+4r8IcZiPhMysF19NZRF05Faxd9A6v8+hSTZ7FKxcLJMpi
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7be1.5865a2b1.k1612; bh=QsfAAXhJiK7bPK4W6dga1j47YA/am3kZhrneieFS/zY=; b=aG92QVeZ19xFlJ9gbCEgmf8EDjt6FYLIlUrp6jsdzKSqc+sJp0qiBWHR1dTXmBePbV4UeiE1IQ0e0UYDZ8WXyumk199jDb2VOUdtbg+T9IQ2TsbKG1xxgp1tYzfCXp2+7HPqR3JLu0+PL73r0sgf2lLYNO8MNKvsGh1qpaOHqd7Nm0izsdkyW+YoL08oFt4tk32HeJTTECQ1+5gYGjh98pjYCmp+/heyqhjmAqGWMllDwH9ILSlnVShJB8gDsR9t
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 29 Dec 2016 23:56:33 -0000
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:56:26 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612291855380.37956@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6, was IPv10
In-Reply-To: <20161229234812.EC4E95E104BC@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20161229161837.34614.qmail@ary.lan> <20161229234812.EC4E95E104BC@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zgRWPlIStnrG1YD_q_yYSP23RKU>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 23:56:34 -0000

> It sounds like you want a homenet router.

Possibly, but I'd rather have a v6 network where the addresses hold still.

> Mind you a lot of this would be a non-issue if hosts used the DNS
> to its full potential by updating their own addresses in the DNS
> using SIG(0) signed UPDATE messages when their addresses change.

That would be swell except the DNS server's address changes, too.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email