IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAC021E81BC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.835
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWQfOkqkTn2V for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA0C21E81B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (c-75-69-155-67.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [75.69.155.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08E918A031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 03:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:32:54 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
Message-ID: <20130906033254.GH62204@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <5F053C0B-4678-4680-A8BF-62FF282ADDCE@softarmor.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309051743130.47262@hiroshima.bogus.com> <52293197.1060809@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjdN478yyU=J7=GTpQxqtdgP8wtdEtna50X+WtA-bV3hg@mail.gmail.com> <52294BDC.4060707@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52294BDC.4060707@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 03:33:03 -0000

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:28:28PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> OK, that's actionable in the IETF, so can we see the I-D before
> the cutoff?

Why is that discussion of this nailed to the cycle of IETF meetings?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email