Re: Old directions in social media.

[Michael Thomas <[e-mail]>]

On 1/8/21 5:02 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 08/01/2021 12:28, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> If the document you are supposed to be reviewing does not give enough
>> context so that you have to review the mailing list discussions then
>> there is clearly something wrong with the document. That should have
>> been your review comment.
> I thought Ned was discussing drafts that were works-in-
> progress rather than what a WG considered the finished
> product. For the former, I agree with Ned that reviewing
> list discussion is sometimes needed. And while yes, in
> the ideal case, after WGLC a draft would stand alone in
> theory, in practice I'm sure there are valid cases where
> is does not, e.g. if the WG decided to punt on feature X.
>
My inner Luddite says that if I need to understand the context from the 
discussions, then the document is not baked enough.

Mike