IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4C312D8A4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOqPpwC7fw3n for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4821212D8A3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j1so91235122oih.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zcXiD0uZueJKjSyYw1ZtMQra0gPyca0JfsQ+aN0x7f4=; b=ov/C0KejX4HftndLuU8bZnGI3PKdAE89QprSzPCo+js1bi1RgDBV2H9IL9ebfdeoJ0 GZ8GxY2B7yiRh6BC+VGHfozDIdzT5s9+3viahqZJ9hy7OAo+H1OOXEqG9sSWWvwT4+do VsAvIc4/INfBPfOqLpx7dmbZrGvDbLuL/mMCov7rZ74Jw+ghTrCuwqVNLThb/SjXUs++ dMZ7VKxOS+m6oHKFW3TLnSJPfUEp2NhVECgcHB8JEI3FY4VgrOEGrrY7YXfJB5spqXJr tVxSU8I+cxB7hNmX5HN732fs0FWNTsMAmwXnlw4LfIBGhHojK3o/zUtTe51ZjqDD/C19 a5pQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zcXiD0uZueJKjSyYw1ZtMQra0gPyca0JfsQ+aN0x7f4=; b=ZEVlRdlF0gPaCssYuqBn7yu9eIJqO+wzvGnGgdAVERsSwpDRtFEQXNyYsJ9iqK1cqg B1nEBXnbaqBTcGkewyNdLtHqLzRiH1b+DIcmq9q2/UvGfk3aO8x7BHhQKEQl2eyxKPmB kxlGiIc2DS3H5EU4VaIxQQWI4VTiW4/MFzt3yQsff7X5c9LKoHV+UdotFBLmOU8xCAom kettlEO8VrMP9GBdv6GQlQxx4t4AEpnvdguXpqbEk72wv5XGvlPdYXfly8uFJGUMmb3q 1ezp345Nd39t3epHO0XWGBZMykvrN1fXpXs9NUjSBY00erzzfL5Jh4MK0ljkrtQlv6iQ puOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI/6pHXX/mTZu2aWY+a1I17pLBFdgmbzLyFmM5koS/D2KqA6ZVvXXcu3hcqhfS+/djNzfI66Ry86x5O7A==
X-Received: by 10.157.1.140 with SMTP id e12mr3297700ote.180.1464199185548; Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.195.137 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1936013436.371962.1464185835726.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20160524210344.64781.qmail@ary.lan> <bd1f61ef-3be2-1a16-804c-68548df0b789@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1605242300120.194@rabdullah.local> <da508fd5-307c-c61e-5b72-185238414a9c@gmail.com> <1936013436.371962.1464185835726.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:59:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAbYVrum5qe2dHkbeWEvQZc7BY3CggRs6xVuZy5injBVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fd90c55ca730533ae7080"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zumlcXerF4HPnjijJO4z2aED7cY>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 17:59:48 -0000

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:17 AM, <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote:

>
> So, it is not OK to put an additional burden sometimes on GLBT people but
> it is OK to put an additional burden on Asian and African and other people
> as far as cost, racism, visa, etc, etc?


The second statement seems to me a strawman, as no one seems to have
asserted that it was okay.

If I have missed an opportunity to work against the impact of racism on
IETF participants contingent on the choice of our venues, I apologize, but
please do not assume that my raising this particular issue in any way means
that I am not willingness to work for fairness in other contexts.


Ted Hardie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email