IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf108planning] [LLC-Board] Response to registration fees feedback

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 15 June 2020 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE553A0AC1; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 01:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yuCumTMQjcP; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 01:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D915B3A0ABE; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 01:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p200300dee7007a00d8ad61fd2da2fe97.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:de:e700:7a00:d8ad:61fd:2da2:fe97]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jkkNs-0004G3-H1; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:22:24 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <537E9798-5D7B-4695-9BB4-0F15AE83B260@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:22:22 +0200
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, "llc-board@ietf.org" <llc-board@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "ietf108planning@ietf.org" <ietf108planning@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A46BCFCC-D397-45EC-8D30-0C83095ECEC0@kuehlewind.net>
References: <2C0F46B2-3F44-4FEA-9B94-DDE8B78CCE3E@kuehlewind.net> <9DFCF179-05CD-412F-888B-6D5C95BA3A14@ietf.org> <537E9798-5D7B-4695-9BB4-0F15AE83B260@cable.comcast.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1592209352;d5f1472f;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1jkkNs-0004G3-H1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/1ySiIUkR1Qdq7SlRk12VBmIDJAs>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] [LLC-Board] Response to registration fees feedback
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:22:34 -0000


> On 15. Jun 2020, at 02:40, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
>> An alternative is that we send those people who get the waiver a survey afterwards that asks a number of useful questions.
> 
> I like the post-meeting survey idea and think it will be better received. (And the fewer things we need to require/ask up front, the better; keep it simple.)

Yes, I agree that might be the better idea as it would be anonymous and we can target this mini-survey given we have the email addresses of all free registrations (hoping that we would get a high answer rate).

Otherwise I would propose something like this:

Reason for registration fee waiver:

This field is optional and not checked on registration. The information from this field will be only used after the meeting to better understand the needs of the community in preparation for the next meeting.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email