Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sat, 09 May 2020 19:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019C3A0F86; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y560Ksar5klM; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f47.google.com (mail-ot1-f47.google.com [209.85.210.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3CB43A10FA; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f47.google.com with SMTP id e20so4265223otk.12; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AHhSsORdwxwvVeESAFUbmpUM2iMPSU9nFwUTilBihOM=; b=ZhBFzzJTv/5hSnQ7vUlEAXEcgzlHcV72eYYwHWEkS2OngNMH2vKHKZ3ukbkaG6aq94 K5JLo/rmEd2pSRP573fedKNJGGxiVkmSrnmd/pmpQeW070TiS/E3mioD++Y6FWhvn2aH lLyT6mRE27XFEBOFGcHIDimiNpe6tcU6NlHVYczy8EKzkb/Uegg4f1pkkAErXoECak/3 V9eN+TtkDYsDc1p0Isut0xKGgt0nkbZwkG2qoPhJ/pAhNJ4Zbt3RHPPOR5vewb9ZYyiG rRGhqLSDreWHMwv4iYPrRAtkmJvDaHdvmNPh64Gx2zt3gdnpAY4Iz0TR5MzKeWZnI8VZ 7j4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuacD1ENcRQ/j3G64iNlEx3vBgO9CUu0ABMbQ8IhzBojca1y12oE hmBFhS0Z4OldCRPdPDiwQq/E9qdkDP2mMsq8QQ4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIKUxQY0p4dK+s7bdDrvgF1m51iZt3Xt2FCkkXLNDdk3aGZ0TgEuyfhNufuekhocST0ECIvvosLB/ciJosCJ7I=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:bd1:: with SMTP id 75mr7347245oth.155.1589050882907; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2DECE3B5-26E0-4A07-9696-63EEE9E080EE@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2DECE3B5-26E0-4A07-9696-63EEE9E080EE@gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 15:01:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgHUPDNtOhPhJNNHirRBOu0u1qh2shF_siXeFygjEkXqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, ietf108planning@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067e0ff05a53bbdd3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/FCrME7eOyHBC9XS-_8MSH-i5sXI>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 19:01:46 -0000
I think this discussion is somewhat useful but is almost certainly going to prove moot. The limiting constraint on when IETF is going to be able to resume in-person meetings will almost certainly be the point at which the host countries are willing to open their borders to visitors. Note that even the UK has finally given in and imposed a 14 day quarantine for visitors. We can expect that approach to become universal as governments realize that a combination of social distancing and extensive contact tracing are (currently) the only viable strategies for avoiding the need for a renewed lockdown. I can't see that happening until after the local lockdowns have been lifted a considerable time. Allowing international travel has the least impact as far as risk/reward is considered for the local population. It is not going to happen until after the shops and restaurants are open on a reasonably normal schedule. What we might well end up having to consider is 'where can we meet?'. I see zero possibility of meeting in Madrid and almost no possibility of Bangkok. We may be lucky if we can meet in 2021.
- [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decisio… IETF Executive Director
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Stewart Bryant