Re: [Ietf108planning] [irsg] Preview of survey on virtual meetings

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Fri, 24 April 2020 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121B63A1104 for <ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkLK_XAnsmTJ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jays-mbp.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A654D3A10FD; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <C0E4186F-B416-4314-A9F3-F37371E7609C@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B1C01E5E-F2D2-4C0C-8AFC-CC37E2042DCB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 21:37:58 +1200
In-Reply-To: <93b57be5-6b76-a3a5-bd0a-bc380dd26c09@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: ietf108planning@ietf.org
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <F671598D-4014-4583-B860-BC6C76C53074@ietf.org> <f82472e3-40c2-254e-a70e-bb01a544c730@cs.tcd.ie> <7F84E1AE-5EB2-46E0-A443-22B220271A81@ietf.org> <93b57be5-6b76-a3a5-bd0a-bc380dd26c09@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/LavClP5bOVdALFpT-MmIEiDmaQg>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] [irsg] Preview of survey on virtual meetings
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:38:03 -0000


> On 24/04/2020, at 9:16 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> All good otherwise, but just one follow-up:
> 
> On 24/04/2020 04:26, Jay Daley wrote:
>>> PS: Longer term, it'd be nice if we had a less privacy invasive
>>> service to use than survey monkey. In this case I can't see
>>> comments from others without creating an account (which I don't
>>> wanna do), and there's really no need for user-tracking for our
>>> surveys.
>> The surveys are run with all user tracking turned off but I take your
>> point about comments - others have made the same point.
> IIRC, when the survey goes live, ads are displayed, JS
> is required and other web tracking galore happens, to
> the point where I can't use my default browser setup to
> take the survey. That's not a major deal, and happens
> sadly often, but there's no reason why we need to use
> an ad-driven survey service if a more privacy friendly
> one exists.
> 
> I don't do surveys so not sure if there is such. But I
> do run polls and always use dudle [1] rather than the
> better known ad-driven alternative. Most people seem
> to not know or care, a few like that, and I've only
> ever had one person bemoan a missing feature from the
> commercial service (google calendar integration). So
> be worth someone checking if there's a good alternative
> to survey monkey IMO (non-urgently).

I don’t know about the free tier of Surveymonkey, but there are no ads on the paid tiers and we are on a paid tier.

I’ve always found Surveymonkey quite clumsy and so at some point I do want to look for an alternative.

Jay

> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> [1] https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/better-than-survey-monkey/
> <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>-- 
> Ietf108planning mailing list
> Ietf108planning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org