Re: [IETFMIBS] IANA maintained MIB

"Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <nobo@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF241AE194 for <ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:08:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y5U5FlV8l2ub for <ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43771AE138 for <ietfmibs@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:08:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1141; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384902526; x=1386112126; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vadUnxTqlQoMkMIjwyYI4wj+hX6uXssGXQeb/1S+htk=; b=J7MlY/QDAbQAY5TmJkkUUMrYOYQff9q/LgZdVSu3vM9ITH+e41lo3tei mhq8SNgWuxbLeKGx/7gnEQfMxEuUZxl/OFgLILMd5QhbscSgJhNyINqG1 2wBferdX6dXej6by+sDbsz4/UMg1NAKuvQQMISOFEPgkDP+VzGENpLVPl 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFAGzui1KtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABWA4JmIThTvz6BIhZ0giUBAQEEOj8MAgICAQgOAgEEAQEBChQJBxsXFAkIAgQBDQUIh3kBv3EXBI8iIRAHBguDD4ESA5lBkF6DKIIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,732,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="765320"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 23:08:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAJN8j0o002500 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:08:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:08:45 -0600
From: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Thread-Topic: [IETFMIBS] IANA maintained MIB
Thread-Index: AQHO5U2O9cQd167QikegXfT0KWJafZos3f7ogABm2ACAAEr5gP//nbYw
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:08:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3941DEE8F9B@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <20131119173407.GC22285@pfrc> <073101cee553$e88ca220$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20131119183032.GD22285@pfrc> <20131119225853.GC43421@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20131119225853.GC43421@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.240.173]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:00:58 -0800
Cc: "ietfmibs@ietf.org" <ietfmibs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IETFMIBS] IANA maintained MIB
X-BeenThere: ietfmibs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF MIB Discussion list <ietfmibs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietfmibs>, <mailto:ietfmibs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietfmibs/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietfmibs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietfmibs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietfmibs>, <mailto:ietfmibs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:08:53 -0000

Thanks Juergen. Will make changes accordingly to BFD [TC] MIB docs.

Thanks,
Nobo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-
> university.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 5:59 PM
> To: Jeffrey Haas
> Cc: t.petch; Nobo Akiya (nobo); ietfmibs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IETFMIBS] IANA maintained MIB
> 
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:30:32PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> >
> > What's not clear is if the IANA- prefix is a requirement for the TCs
> > that the BFD MIBs are creating.
> >
> 
> It does not hurt. What I personally find also really useful is to have the
> module name begin with IANA- (most IANA modules do, the exceptions
> prove the rule). (If all SMI parsers out there would properly resolve name
> clashes using module names, the IANA prefix for TCs etc would not be
> needed but the reality is not perfect.)
> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>