[IETFMIBS] IANA maintained MIB

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 19 November 2013 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D401AE098 for <ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:34:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbJ7Ofn9ZUH2 for <ietfmibs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBD41AE08C for <ietfmibs@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E712EC54A; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:34:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:34:07 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: ietfmibs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131119173407.GC22285@pfrc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>
Subject: [IETFMIBS] IANA maintained MIB
X-BeenThere: ietfmibs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF MIB Discussion list <ietfmibs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietfmibs>, <mailto:ietfmibs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietfmibs/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietfmibs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietfmibs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietfmibs>, <mailto:ietfmibs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:34:15 -0000

I'm in the midst of doing my document shepherd work for the BFD TC MIB
(draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib).  And yes, I caught the syntax error and have
requested the authors to fix it. :-)

One motivation to split this TC MIB off was the long term desire to make
this an IANA maintained MIB - a detail which had remained in one of my old
emails but hadn't received follow-up until now.  As I work through the
checklist and the commentary in RFC 5226, I find that I'm still not quite
certain what we'd need to change either the draft or the IANA
requests in order to properly make this an IANA maintained MIB.
Policy-wise, IETF Review is the likely appropriate thing to do.

Can someone recommend either a relatively recent RFC/draft that puts a TC
MIB into IANA Maintenance or alternatively lend a hand and suggest some text
for the BFD TC MIB draft?

Thanks,

-- Jeff (for the BFD WG)