Archive

Please keep me updated on today's call, I have a customer meeting at the
same time that I can't get out of.

~Tim

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:38 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I think we should try to progress this work over the coming weeks.
> Hopefully we can meet tomorrow and discuss next steps.
>
> I re-read the latest version of the questionnaire and was wondering if we
> should spell out what features in the RFCs we are interested in?  For
> example, in Section 3.1.2, we ask “Which IGMPv3 features have you
> implemented?” I can imagine some folks giving answers referring to what
> they consider IGMPv3 features (e.g. snooping proxy etc) that are not
> actually in the RFCs we are focusing on.  Furthermore, in the PIM survey
> (RFC7063) the authors actually itemise the features in RFC4601 in which
> they are interested.  So, to help us be able to better process the
> responses, I wonder if we should itemise the features that we are trying to
> gauge their popularity?
>
> Which made me wonder,  other than Include list and exclude list, are there
> other features we should call out?
>
> Regards,
> Femi
>
> > On 1 May 2019, at 15:18, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mankamana, Timothy and myself were on the call.  Mankamana is going to
> email the chairs to try to determine the next steps to distributing the
> questionnaire.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Femi
> >
> >
> >> On 1 May 2019, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, thats the classical excuse until we get rid of DST i guess ;-)
> >> I was only 15 minutes late, so i have no real excuse.... ;-)
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:35:08PM +0530, Anish Peter wrote:
> >>> Very sorry, I happened to join this meeting 1hr late.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:48 PM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <
> >>> mankamis@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure .
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 30, 2019, at 03:01, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
> >>>> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I feel we are losing some momentum with this effort and so I think
> >>>> tomorrow when we meet it???d be really good to identify exactly what
> remains
> >>>> to be done and set some milestones and deadlines.  Does that seem
> >>>> reasonable?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Femi
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >>>> --
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >>>>
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ---
> >> tte@cs.fau.de
> >
>
> --
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>

Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting