Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B4F120132 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aq-OZOYE-10C for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63DFD120123 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id p59so536712edp.7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sxDgMKAynFLEcVKzzxrD96nS1dItlqHRkBuk95oqw4M=; b=XN0mlkBjk2v9rWthMr1HIVBAZsgFA1RtSc59CGY7ModiTGSfaF2d5BRQ0g5QHEo0J0 vhtjAKNwjQFtIVvIJGSNwRWSx38f0xSe1KGuG35X9UZEPDdMeOjN1I2o3npaL33iQuYm BcQqmmzx0upe5djz5keBhsxKoKhyBaJVYkF9S45YWps1zKdCeWB46rV3wo3x+xXFkC51 QZJDt1wi0ie8xqqCxTxoLGCg/3l/xYZrxykTLKTSt4B0n88w8cj6tQGLD2wIke7sF2pa xrhrJSmpB4+TmvGzsZgFmvaUzlQTqupykQ8LUt3OzSsjEpEF0ZnG8OCTEjxieahZcgE8 uwkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sxDgMKAynFLEcVKzzxrD96nS1dItlqHRkBuk95oqw4M=; b=kuy4lnFVL2xRfnPTjO1uxgn5VoTq0a2K+4ZuNPkMJXsk/sPwjjibpZWIvqLYkLy4bM aUcSEQGe4vYnUPuSaTWb5J8y0xz3R/6YDwgnlxZUHd6pfFBh2I3/XIbJn/XmAagAdGfV VvS/4XH053r+TzB4WToB7J1Dysxxb9KTdVJPw3ChRbpNGYqr88gyCamllDiYD6gXt8Yo CzslKKVZ1BkcsB7YUgSF93ITYSuRkaXb/211zWFCCfCM4IXb9t3uV430J0zXB0PCK50/ CmLy0UM0QK3NrOP2pFMcXL4ixTztKFe0KRqkq8DY7gRlpMah1Vm8ziuH/UOvYoNcKdAs nP+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXrtUkpBTOx6Qcoievh28CTK5j/5wFMRKDj1QtEmsxHzGq5IUln GzNApkNim50IsAgajsCLYZUvRd+d6t8ihwrQJ8Ndxg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwIH6btEkEJkE2VAWDkaKt+JG6CCR3+29TxWGs57V7jJY9+hA/ev13ejPze1ww4+uoj9DxDcW4dlLipFB2zSTI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4dce:: with SMTP id f14mr6649605ejw.22.1572404675936; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6C716B06-1A87-4BA0-A535-6D0073D95E22@arista.com> <C1BD52A0-7F4F-41CE-BA66-A850D1737FCF@arista.com> <31CBF61F-94A9-4F7E-BA73-20811451B01D@cisco.com> <BYAPR13MB28073A3460918E6EE4420E97F4600@BYAPR13MB2807.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR13MB28073A3460918E6EE4420E97F4600@BYAPR13MB2807.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:04:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtLMecXZVvprQHw6xA6HFJunDS-YcVhxUMKyHQ1qqLb7XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>
Cc: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000271563059617fe38"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/G3gTGu4Y4bxZoE-QUgouHfANTXM>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 03:04:40 -0000

Hi

It's not strictly needed, but I think it is helpful, and the hardest part,
creating the survey, is already done. I think we should move forward.

Without the survey we can only speculate about what is out there. I think
it is really useful data.

Stig


On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 18:04 Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I had a chat with Alyssa Cooper, here at Nanog, to discuss how best to
> engage the operators to move an rfc to internet standard. She recommended
> not doing a survey, saying its probably unnecessary. We can certainly still
> send it as it worked with pim-sm. Or we can simply email the nanog list
> (and I2 and ?) and explain our intention to move 3376/3810 to Internet
> standard and see if they +1.
>
>
>
> What say ye?
>
> mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> * On Behalf Of *Mankamana
> Mishra (mankamis)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2019 4:25 PM
> *To:* Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>;
> igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>uk>; Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>om>;
> Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
>
>
>
> Done
>
>
>
> *From: *Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Olufemi
> Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 4:23 PM
> *To: *"igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>uk>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>om>,
> Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
>
>
>
> The naming of the drafts has been a bit messy.  We’ve had:
>
> draft-volunteers-pim-igmp-mld-bis-00.txt
>
> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-bis-00
>
> draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-00
>
>
>
> Rather than creating a new document the WG chairs suggested
> creating draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-01 which I have just
> posted.  The -00 does not have the email address of some of the co-authors
> including myself.  Therefore, can someone whose email address was on the
> previous revision and so got a notification please approve the publication?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Femi
>
>
>
>
>
> On 28 Oct 2019, at 01:15, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> HI,
>
>
>
> I’ve posted the updated version of the draft.  I could not update the
> original draft which has since expired as my email address was omitted on
> the original draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/102921/
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fsubmit%2Fstatus%2F102921%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C61e4cbd6e942426890a608d75cc73d31%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637079883125293782&sdata=h6KOHsVyutaGKamll%2BXua0AWqjksmttOnmohIrnQ438%3D&reserved=0>)
> and so I’ve simply posted a new draft which I’ve attached FYI.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Femi
>
>
>
> <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-update-survey-00.txt>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>