Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022C712039B for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2xlv9VolaK5z for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B251202AB for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E82548353; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 771B6440041; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:49:07 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
Message-ID: <20190723154907.3b74oiijconcdgjv@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com> <20190716195934.rty724quanksz2hp@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F9B56DCD-5D7C-4DBA-BBD6-0A9C2039E34F@ieee.org> <4767384C-D17E-4E37-A264-CE783376F066@arista.com> <E46F8822-8F47-40DF-95D1-98BE7A956697@arista.com> <20190723152412.xls7ocfnwmlnvkj3@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B4F0C12E-A5B0-4014-ADE2-F61775241B91@ieee.org> <20190723153018.mij7szy36o4yosot@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <0594C8D3-5ACE-4B29-B740-DFFCDCB9EED4@arista.com> <CAOSSMjWzW9E2po6bYL5WkcpL8xyvi8V4q_OcmnyD3Rwut8rXWQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOSSMjWzW9E2po6bYL5WkcpL8xyvi8V4q_OcmnyD3Rwut8rXWQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/HKfr6B398Yxdy6GUHU0qpc8NsD4>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:49:25 -0000

I need to chair my WG at 1:30, so meet would be nice, but i don't think
that time then is sufficient to go to some lunch place, so if anybody
is interest to go to llunch at noon, let me know, i will be back at 1PM
before Laurier to meet.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:36:17AM -0400, Timothy Winters wrote:
> I can be free at 1.
> 
> ~Tim
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps we can meet at 1pm then if that works better?  Perhaps Tim will be
> > free by then too?
> >
> > We can meet on the first floor, perhaps at the entrance to Laurier?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Femi
> >
> > > On 23 Jul 2019, at 11:30, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > How long do you think ? 12:30 ?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:28:50AM -0400, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:
> > >> Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon.
> > >> But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join.
> > >> Sorry about that.
> > >>
> > >> Hitoshi
> > >>
> > >>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote:
> > >>>> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal?  If
> > so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing
> > outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to
> > progress this work, hopefully this week.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Femi
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I???ll be there too.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself.  Anyone else?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then?  Say at noon?  Anyone that
> > does not suit?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Femi
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'll be there.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update.
> > >>>>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked
> > one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got
> > it. I hope it can be a good input.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hitoshi
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ===from here===
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.2.  Questionnaire for Network Operators
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.2.1.  Deployment Status
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network?  And
> > >>>>>> for how long has it been deployed?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1.  IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2.  IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.  IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 4.  Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 5.  MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 6.  MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 7.  Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.2.2.  Deployment Specifics
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1.  Which IGMPv3 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
> > >>>>>>    list in use?)
> > >>>>>>     Membership-report for SSM
> > >>>>>>     No filter function is used.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2.  Which MLDv2 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
> > >>>>>>    list in use?)
> > >>>>>>     Membership-report for SSM
> > >>>>>>     No filter function is used.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.  Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between
> > >>>>>>    different IGMP versions?  (Between which IGMP versions?)  (What
> > >>>>>>    is your experience with this fallback mechanism?)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>     No
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 4.  Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor)
> > >>>>>>    implementations for your deployment?  (Have you encountered any
> > >>>>>>    inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst
> > >>>>>>    differing implementations?)  (What are your concerns about these
> > >>>>>>    issues?)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>    No
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.2.3.  Deployment Perspectives
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1.  What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
> > >>>>>>    Specifying Source for Multicast
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2.  What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
> > >>>>>>    None
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3.  What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to
> > >>>>>>    update these documents?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ===to here===
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not
> > tried to
> > >>>>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Who else is coming ?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>>>> Toerless
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra
> > (mankamis) wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>> Mankamana
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of
> > Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
> > >>>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
> > >>>>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> > >>>>>>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ~Tim
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
> > 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I
> > was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to
> > meet up?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the
> > PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so
> > it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any
> > thoughts/feedback?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG
> > chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual
> > mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Femi
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > >>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> > >>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > >>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > >>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > >>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > >>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> ---
> > >>> tte@cs.fau.de
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > >> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > >
> > > --
> > > ---
> > > tte@cs.fau.de
> > >
> > > --
> > > Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > > Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >
> > --
> > Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> > Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >

> -- 
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis


-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de