IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 16 July 2019 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D61120637 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIFnfXqbJfxQ for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF22F12016D for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77622548002; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:59:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 66D30440041; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:59:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:59:34 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
Cc: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190716195934.rty724quanksz2hp@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <F7E6E464-A65B-4920-91FA-52FE71F2FB87@arista.com> <CAOSSMjVLbQ2znHoMm6QC9sJLHM24ngDHZbp2cX_fxnA8fMJKGQ@mail.gmail.com> <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/LxnZblMftHqrNjFdplnvpLMyF8U>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:59:46 -0000

I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to
work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.

Who else is coming ?

Cheers
    Toerless

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
> Hi,
> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
> 
> Thanks
> Mankamana
> 
> 
> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
> 
> I'm available Tuesday morning.
> 
> ~Tim
> 
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up?
> 
> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
> 
> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback?
> 
> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
> 
> Regards,
> Femi
> 
> --
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis

> -- 
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis


-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email