Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:30 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED63D1203EE for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8SKezTEkW_V for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77FBE1203BE for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FEF54833E; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:30:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 6AC15440041; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:30:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:30:18 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190723153018.mij7szy36o4yosot@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <F7E6E464-A65B-4920-91FA-52FE71F2FB87@arista.com> <CAOSSMjVLbQ2znHoMm6QC9sJLHM24ngDHZbp2cX_fxnA8fMJKGQ@mail.gmail.com> <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com> <20190716195934.rty724quanksz2hp@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F9B56DCD-5D7C-4DBA-BBD6-0A9C2039E34F@ieee.org> <4767384C-D17E-4E37-A264-CE783376F066@arista.com> <E46F8822-8F47-40DF-95D1-98BE7A956697@arista.com> <20190723152412.xls7ocfnwmlnvkj3@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B4F0C12E-A5B0-4014-ADE2-F61775241B91@ieee.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B4F0C12E-A5B0-4014-ADE2-F61775241B91@ieee.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/McCUpFseiY-7SsJfe5NSbNuIwxQ>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:39 -0000
How long do you think ? 12:30 ? On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:28:50AM -0400, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote: > Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon. > But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join. > Sorry about that. > > Hitoshi > > > On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > > > Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?! > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote: > >> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal? If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat? > >> > >> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Femi > >> > >>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I???ll be there too. > >>> > >>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself. Anyone else? > >>> > >>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then? Say at noon? Anyone that does not suit? > >>> > >>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Femi > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> I'll be there. > >>>> > >>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update. > >>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Hitoshi > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ===from here=== > >>>> > >>>> 3.2. Questionnaire for Network Operators > >>>> > >>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda > >>>> > >>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP > >>>> > >>>> Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net > >>>> > >>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?: > >>>> > >>>> 3.2.1. Deployment Status > >>>> > >>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network? And > >>>> for how long has it been deployed? > >>>> > >>>> 1. IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since: > >>>> > >>>> 2. IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since: > >>>> > >>>> 3. IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since: > >>>> > >>>> 4. Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since: > >>>> > >>>> 5. MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since: > >>>> > >>>> 6. MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since: > >>>> > >>>> 7. Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since: > >>>> > >>>> 3.2.2. Deployment Specifics > >>>> > >>>> 1. Which IGMPv3 features are in use? (Is Exclude mode with source > >>>> list in use?) > >>>> Membership-report for SSM > >>>> No filter function is used. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2. Which MLDv2 features are in use? (Is Exclude mode with source > >>>> list in use?) > >>>> Membership-report for SSM > >>>> No filter function is used. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 3. Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between > >>>> different IGMP versions? (Between which IGMP versions?) (What > >>>> is your experience with this fallback mechanism?) > >>>> > >>>> No > >>>> > >>>> 4. Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor) > >>>> implementations for your deployment? (Have you encountered any > >>>> inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst > >>>> differing implementations?) (What are your concerns about these > >>>> issues?) > >>>> > >>>> No > >>>> > >>>> 3.2.3. Deployment Perspectives > >>>> > >>>> 1. What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2? > >>>> Specifying Source for Multicast > >>>> > >>>> 2. What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2? > >>>> None > >>>> > >>>> 3. What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to > >>>> update these documents? > >>>> > >>>> ===to here=== > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to > >>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week. > >>>>> > >>>>> Who else is coming ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> Toerless > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> Mankamana > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> > >>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM > >>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> > >>>>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ~Tim > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > >>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Femi > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org> > >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> --- > >>>>> tte@cs.fau.de > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > > > > -- > > --- > > tte@cs.fau.de > > -- > Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Stig Venaas
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Stig Venaas
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mike McBride
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mike McBride
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe