[Igmp-mld-bis] Revising IGMPv3/MLDv2 RFCs

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Mon, 08 February 2021 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ED83A1653 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:04:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwz2ozHmLnkY for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F943A1652 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:04:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id j5so16638438iog.11 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:04:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SFzPcQt3Pvs6b5/+gP/Psi3j5yzj48awCbaI2nJJjK4=; b=axqVAJQ42hglJ+f/0r1xIZIeSBwTipU2kNwm7SoccBBAUf8ShFCbtAcV0DgQJufMoD fxabazG1NQU/qhBxMix8hjREKSigOYg05/SglK/3G11HZUhwxuiKyXlaexq+uUuN8eLQ qHRfCSpVQsq/azU4naILvW4TT+Uo8THZpdD6MzDSA8ap4O75WRohGlIyfZifMVN4t3l7 R0EaSmuttbVhJjQTZzlXAF+mALosQpZflwTpE3VqiWOgxYs46/Z4X8EvXSlDh16ZLKio QumIe8SdxpoFi0A1NXaILg5XQgyFT6nsFMYZulkla91Ie1eeAKuGN7hR+MB6HCCBQD3t OLiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SFzPcQt3Pvs6b5/+gP/Psi3j5yzj48awCbaI2nJJjK4=; b=qBbfLCl5FV7BB8enuYPaZTri8vwS2uenNaCla8YzDoz3KlgtY70QDucsGwPBZ3t7xQ Brux64clkGhKV77v7QNg8ISMK3SKjC6uO1x0HGFJ++bFwn3S4Y/vWmZmLkTu8jGEz5/i MIfPFKBsX9ysnLwIaxMuhfQyraJhTxqSebowJLUUv7uOVb0dz8C7OXWjeKffTxk8+/Kx BJK+dnNTwffq40GuV239ZJQ3jogMOSkuuKlNV3IUY5I+VyaMLvkpMYxamifAUJ4Nbqud sOxpbPUDdtihRLToXHryPtlt0PyEikbi9IjCKWQKa4DMmPgpe9eyqa6eRSfbK+k3TwU5 UqHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ywYXfbUWYTAdvo2U4N1tzPcTxKC0yGCWMubGQBc+T+fY97N+Z n1MqAXdloGZTi9Zr1UG7JlwCIpewbLpbZtbSf7bHHxm+bDk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFDWXaEnDgSEuhAZNjoSNGzrfsi0RxCTQM+y+31bln88LJahDUkvSdbq8BO/wyXRAd/WS/ic+/e+62S/aAXSQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9083:: with SMTP id x3mr16766046jaf.17.1612821880973; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:04:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:04:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHANBt+90s47PJt5W9qz+yKaVurASpHpxZf8=YBKpAf90+34Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
Cc: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/US7-0FsQeG1CccMI7wjDyP1u8Qo>
Subject: [Igmp-mld-bis] Revising IGMPv3/MLDv2 RFCs
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:04:47 -0000

Hi

I know this has been taking much longer than anyone would have liked,
but we got the survey out, thanks for all the effort you put into it,
we got the results, and we are ready to start revising the RFCs.

Who here would be interested in continuing the work on this?

I'll check with the WG as well, but thought I would see what the
interest is here first.

Thanks,
Stig