Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11199120159 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cO-xm12BelYq for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C260120153 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id g2so19732303pfq.0 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=d56ntWkzYq8HYZlPrDTxum32B05XoJc1rfqq0MveU6s=; b=OYl5rtgvuES+aeJ4HxEyfRwJnvDDPDca5J/PY39Mn9nLw8FD4DVdkL1fywbhO1lES3 dqzf43MlMrZV/1Wgki2NlloKEPpo0BOE3nyuykcoxgbJSw48GpNLLVDgAhLKs1thqMln aFNXgtd4Hiv+UfGRASzD03RjG4PznfICqkSXN+Yspz53bHmRfjrreItvUzoKGNxNFFZN KtKm32cx0Q9HN/RhsIIABMLP9/xH7iSgkj6MF2cYB6qVcjudgejH8e8KkFrElXwsmGrK bkrzACr+IPwg+BpQVDKanx1eJaiWqauURs9+KEX0Lu4zJRneEjqlOc7dd+YDJi73V4Tx flGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=d56ntWkzYq8HYZlPrDTxum32B05XoJc1rfqq0MveU6s=; b=NzDPns8uZdjH6k1B8qVmwaahrE8P2o6Pyfa9JQyZsUyn0I5TLv24uJm42gLA6DfGcK GZuwzYMhrEv88eSEJaNy3TPL4QUKM65vgpt1WGw2K/t2A0G+pDR6ksieCUWNFYOmJw6E 1oRe8Ldgv28SnJV4TzVUDTWIhrX/7EPDgvxjTY5Qe+nLLDQHTaSl4sJg4f3ffwga+VsY 3FV00Tt68yYqvDAejNm6zryxaQUixzGJ8WfWaC/w3RKqepb9swEzbryM2t3jxxAsraBK C7nqDMFRm5Fk0XMQMC//DQ9LM5krlkgDhLjaofqdlJKsesaVxSbajA5AfrKwq76yYIwE TVfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXj68d/9VajljBWE4hOPybQGyaG2WrJlrQ/qqe/xsPRfElmbe1V JDoShDxrUaBQiExf3KWEc8YRaXPpiIBaOTUbId4dqQ3ScxLJYYM+TJuVWgkFRAk1E6NTDUdkWd7 28hQuEduEheqdeKG4sVi2YcUnePqmmo75rRsBSfT36/xelFX2APX/ez9RZYDNa45VU6L3WEnOuR kJSlMcuXlb+pKZ788=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1Ypd0kVSRn40HQN6YE7wj2wXk5fK6a8kFF4s4dHKb4hcdtuokATKd4WkN2DYVP/2JkhjobA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:19d:: with SMTP id 29mr85706164pjc.71.1563914950558; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:a0:4001:100::1ac? ([2620:a0:4001:100::1ac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q7sm53205915pff.2.2019.07.23.13.49.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
Message-Id: <8A40AD7D-B927-4DB3-A10E-20A1C4696B21@arista.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F89BB890-F277-4ABE-86EA-E576507C79FC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:49:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtJ_iLn45at8hsPAYDDbTV1g-0n38PS64R_NdTri+=E-oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
References: <20190723173747.45vmewvyedcuadmj@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAHANBtKb-M9DLwmrNt15-nvpjkwr=oOYt5csJ97t+6Ovs8MDXA@mail.gmail.com> <2F35843F-EFAF-4622-A0F1-3144B4C41ED2@arista.com> <CAHANBtJ_iLn45at8hsPAYDDbTV1g-0n38PS64R_NdTri+=E-oQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Info: arista,google_mail,monitor
X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Sent: true
X-Gm-Spam: 0
X-Gm-Phishy: 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/Ufmk5HRz3WpBQDNxfP1sTzkraqg>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:49:15 -0000
Stig, > On 23 Jul 2019, at 15:39, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote: > > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:30 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote: >> >> Stig, >> >>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:47, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Too bad I didn't see this until now. The main question I have for you >>> guys is whether you tried to create a list of features, to help people >>> answer consistently which features they have deployed. It may be hard >>> for some to understand that question, and think of what is a feature. >> >> We debated whether or not to include a list of features. And also whether we should restrict ourselves to features explicitly defined in the RFC or mention features that are not defined in the RFCs but are commonly thought of as IGMPv3 features (e.g. snooping proxy). > > Good question. Let us ask the pim WG and also maybe see once we have a > list. I would think the most important are the ones in the RFC since > it will help us find out what parts might potentially be removed from > the revised version. > OK, fair enough. >> For IGMPv3, the identified features so far are: >> + SSM membership report >> + Include mode with source list >> + Exclude mode with source list >> >> Any thoughts? > > Maybe not a feature exactly, but I think v2 compatibility might be > worth including. Do people rely on this or is it just causing > problems? There are operational problems caused by devices falling > back to v2 when someone sends a v2 report for an SSM group for > instance. > We have some questions on fallback between different versions already in the survey. Do these not suffice? If so, can you please provide some text? :-) > I'll add you guys to the pim agenda. Slides are not needed, but if you > have slides, please give them to me ASAP. > I’ve quickly thrown together some slides and attached them. But please do not post them yet until the other folks in the survey team have had a chance to see that they are happy with them or make the changes they want. I’ve attached them as Powerpoint for this reason. Also, one of the four of us here needs to give the update to the WG. Any volunteers? Regards, Femi
> Thanks, > Stig > >> Should we list only features defined in the specific RFCs or take a more liberal approach? >> >> Regards, >> Femi >> >> >>> >>> Can one of you give a brief update in the pim WG? It helps that people >>> know what is going on, and people in the WG may also be able to assist >>> in spreading the survey. >>> >>> Stig >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:38 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks folks for catching up. >>>> >>>> Points collected: >>>> >>>> a) Tim Chown: When you get irregular responses like "i do not understand >>>> the questions", please inform us (anonymized). >>>> >>>> b) Let discuss during WG meeting ideas whom to send to: >>>> groups, e.g.: >>>> internet2 multicast group >>>> multiplicators, e.g.: >>>> Dino Farinacci (still working with a customer, knowin operators). >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Toerless >>>> >>>> In-Reply-To: <20190723154907.3b74oiijconcdgjv@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Toerless Eckert wrote: >>>>> I need to chair my WG at 1:30, so meet would be nice, but i don't think >>>>> that time then is sufficient to go to some lunch place, so if anybody >>>>> is interest to go to llunch at noon, let me know, i will be back at 1PM >>>>> before Laurier to meet. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:36:17AM -0400, Timothy Winters wrote: >>>>>> I can be free at 1. >>>>>> >>>>>> ~Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM Olufemi Komolafe <femi= >>>>>> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps we can meet at 1pm then if that works better? Perhaps Tim will be >>>>>>> free by then too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We can meet on the first floor, perhaps at the entrance to Laurier? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Femi >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 11:30, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How long do you think ? 12:30 ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:28:50AM -0400, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon. >>>>>>>>> But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join. >>>>>>>>> Sorry about that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hitoshi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal? If >>>>>>> so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing >>>>>>> outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to >>>>>>> progress this work, hopefully this week. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Femi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I???ll be there too. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself. Anyone else? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then? Say at noon? Anyone that >>>>>>> does not suit? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Femi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll be there. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked >>>>>>> one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got >>>>>>> it. I hope it can be a good input. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hitoshi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===from here=== >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.2. Questionnaire for Network Operators >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.2.1. Deployment Status >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network? And >>>>>>>>>>>>> for how long has it been deployed? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 7. Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.2.2. Deployment Specifics >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Which IGMPv3 features are in use? (Is Exclude mode with source >>>>>>>>>>>>> list in use?) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Membership-report for SSM >>>>>>>>>>>>> No filter function is used. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Which MLDv2 features are in use? (Is Exclude mode with source >>>>>>>>>>>>> list in use?) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Membership-report for SSM >>>>>>>>>>>>> No filter function is used. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between >>>>>>>>>>>>> different IGMP versions? (Between which IGMP versions?) (What >>>>>>>>>>>>> is your experience with this fallback mechanism?) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor) >>>>>>>>>>>>> implementations for your deployment? (Have you encountered any >>>>>>>>>>>>> inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst >>>>>>>>>>>>> differing implementations?) (What are your concerns about these >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues?) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.2.3. Deployment Perspectives >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Specifying Source for Multicast >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2? >>>>>>>>>>>>> None >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to >>>>>>>>>>>>> update these documents? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===to here=== >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not >>>>>>> tried to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who else is coming ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Toerless >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra >>>>>>> (mankamis) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mankamana >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of >>>>>>> Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi= >>>>>>> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I >>>>>>> was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to >>>>>>> meet up? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the >>>>>>> PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so >>>>>>> it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any >>>>>>> thoughts/feedback? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG >>>>>>> chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual >>>>>>> mechanics of distributing the survey etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Femi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> --- >>>>> tte@cs.fau.de >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --- >>>> tte@cs.fau.de >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis >>
- [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Stig Venaas
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Stig Venaas
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mike McBride
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mike McBride
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe