Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:24 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAE31203E1 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnXyexGnQ1qC for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 715F41203EC for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1C2548353; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:24:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 53404440041; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:24:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:24:12 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190723152412.xls7ocfnwmlnvkj3@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <F7E6E464-A65B-4920-91FA-52FE71F2FB87@arista.com> <CAOSSMjVLbQ2znHoMm6QC9sJLHM24ngDHZbp2cX_fxnA8fMJKGQ@mail.gmail.com> <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com> <20190716195934.rty724quanksz2hp@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F9B56DCD-5D7C-4DBA-BBD6-0A9C2039E34F@ieee.org> <4767384C-D17E-4E37-A264-CE783376F066@arista.com> <E46F8822-8F47-40DF-95D1-98BE7A956697@arista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E46F8822-8F47-40DF-95D1-98BE7A956697@arista.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/gBzIeyf33S-hPKZEpTy9fEwSD7w>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:24:40 -0000
Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?! On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote: > Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal? If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat? > > I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week. > > Regards, > Femi > > > On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I???ll be there too. > > > > So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself. Anyone else? > > > > Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then? Say at noon? Anyone that does not suit? > > > > Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi. > > > > Regards, > > Femi > > > > > > > >> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I'll be there. > >> > >> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update. > >> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Hitoshi > >> > >> > >> ===from here=== > >> > >> 3.2. Questionnaire for Network Operators > >> > >> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda > >> > >> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP > >> > >> Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net > >> > >> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?: > >> > >> 3.2.1. Deployment Status > >> > >> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network? And > >> for how long has it been deployed? > >> > >> 1. IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since: > >> > >> 2. IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since: > >> > >> 3. IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since: > >> > >> 4. Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since: > >> > >> 5. MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since: > >> > >> 6. MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since: > >> > >> 7. Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since: > >> > >> 3.2.2. Deployment Specifics > >> > >> 1. Which IGMPv3 features are in use? (Is Exclude mode with source > >> list in use?) > >> Membership-report for SSM > >> No filter function is used. > >> > >> > >> 2. Which MLDv2 features are in use? (Is Exclude mode with source > >> list in use?) > >> Membership-report for SSM > >> No filter function is used. > >> > >> > >> 3. Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between > >> different IGMP versions? (Between which IGMP versions?) (What > >> is your experience with this fallback mechanism?) > >> > >> No > >> > >> 4. Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor) > >> implementations for your deployment? (Have you encountered any > >> inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst > >> differing implementations?) (What are your concerns about these > >> issues?) > >> > >> No > >> > >> 3.2.3. Deployment Perspectives > >> > >> 1. What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2? > >> Specifying Source for Multicast > >> > >> 2. What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2? > >> None > >> > >> 3. What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to > >> update these documents? > >> > >> ===to here=== > >> > >> > >>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > >>> > >>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to > >>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week. > >>> > >>> Who else is coming ? > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Toerless > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Mankamana > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> > >>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM > >>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> > >>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? > >>>> > >>>> I'm available Tuesday morning. > >>>> > >>>> ~Tim > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > >>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up? > >>>> > >>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey? > >>>> > >>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback? > >>>> > >>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Femi > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org> > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> --- > >>> tte@cs.fau.de > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > >> > >> -- > >> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > >> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis > > > > -- > Igmp-mld-bis mailing list > Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Timothy Winters
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Stig Venaas
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Stig Venaas
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mike McBride
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Mike McBride
- Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal? Olufemi Komolafe