Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1811200B7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHIUaRLSfeZ5 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21D921200B4 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id d30so4015379pgm.7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=NmmTW+fksJFLHysqZ1Fzcc8Q6ZKB3QI0ShKSAQbrvws=; b=hfZUhvPQ533HIdkGjwIOUnfncH4zSZIrfxnhnos+y7HmRN+T+ctrrxte8EosPt7FBE x6zbezYyL9BzPmG9/WF91Wc9w2g9FkPlU2tL/rV56tzdBoEbdhI2QmlfS8u0/zb6RoKl EVUL2GC7ZNJb8PdgNehIDQlcOTqBdHl7PiRMmofYhRqRbTW7h21Q1dWVDAXV3AkK3ct+ oxBtsjGiWUPHicbr9op1V5T5mQ9nKfmKBipWe7pYde1lwtb6EHbshsgECtP0g8JLraS+ 4qlDx1rjSLdTa805eP9IzkIiOlxFhst+v8JSuwA3mnrnM9kTeE03lY7c5DcI8HWrae9n 1FqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=NmmTW+fksJFLHysqZ1Fzcc8Q6ZKB3QI0ShKSAQbrvws=; b=JdOqwGer4i4JHZrLm3oxnBFtLSBxhgYPGWa3xd22E+2xKIXbys6FfZj/1CHP8oocgS 5k5JXmyoCNonSxrWGfMpno3AndwfE10IqHwqZAzxXeMLQKITXsynu1WYMzIWI9mGyJ9+ z9oZ27OBX5QrS4Vo4QFupzWCOLJfxLoVlxJ6NyJSEBE2LZ9lUYyzd1QzOyOI/67CiU/P J18K+LL+sfxQUpkfc+/wzshrwblm9R5ZWLK2pbR1PdvzobHYhRH/COyghPa3LHHpkYBL epSJr8LoiT3IZgHY/xoxWqzYeDSmYFXbOO8h8kvWVez3YH01Qp/btCRhOY7wF/XjXpdA F3SA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXk8HLC3WMzU3CM91+T0sU7ysbj20mRICdMQM/M6tWPrzzuR48T FfMNljv9zcEh4yjo3RHS1LRJhA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIQ3+GLJ5b/u3TbAiahRZfll41f7GCRMUkAvQaVDjXxoevUJcFb1fSM6ki0HlcEXyGx6QNOQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5009:: with SMTP id e9mr1307023pgb.396.1559307590461; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.167] ([62.60.61.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c76sm6542816pfc.43.2019.05.31.05.59.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 May 2019 05:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
Message-Id: <82966459-79EF-4160-A3F9-A57381784437@arista.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0DA2D704-F71E-4899-AB07-D74FACD1171A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 13:59:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAA6qS9oxqBAkdY8aqOZjPqOX-y-nYOHLMgBmJZRZXJtmaMG_4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
To: Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <94764FD1-AA9D-475F-A888-ADCF941C0565@arista.com> <9516CE1F-999A-4841-9D77-ABD64C642BE3@cisco.com> <CAA6qS9qGB+zm30nm-Or=8oMSQBpLqV=XeJ68Z3h84T-LWX2fxA@mail.gmail.com> <20190501141529.akjsqlqh64x3qnmf@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5C363D02-6913-4672-82F6-309E10C3E03C@arista.com> <5B00E7A8-F32E-48AC-8CBA-6E0441CD7001@arista.com> <CAA6qS9oxqBAkdY8aqOZjPqOX-y-nYOHLMgBmJZRZXJtmaMG_4Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/ha1_IycmnkrwgO-5SRtDM9DLjY0>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 12:59:53 -0000

> On 29 May 2019, at 14:25, Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Once again got late! sorry. 

No probs.  Mankamana and I were on the call.  We agreed that it’d be good to try to progress things and contact the WG chairs to get things moving.

I will email the chairs but there are a couple of things we need to nail down:

All,
Please have a read of the latest version of the draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-00>) and let me know if there are any other IGMPv3 or MLDv2 features specified in RFC3376 and RFC3810 respectively other than “include list” and “exclude list” that we should itemise?  Given our objectives, I think it is important that we restrict ourselves to features explicitly defined in these RFCs.

Also, the authors’ affiliations, email addresses etc in the draft are incomplete.  Please can you have a look and let me know if you want me to make any additions or changes to your information?

Toerless, please can you send me the source and I will make these changes.  I’ll create a new revision which I will forward to the WG chairs.

It’d  be good to try do this over the next day or so therefore a prompt response would be appreciated :-)

Regards,
Femi

> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:08 AM Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
> I think we should try to progress this work over the coming weeks.  Hopefully we can meet tomorrow and discuss next steps.
> 
> I re-read the latest version of the questionnaire and was wondering if we should spell out what features in the RFCs we are interested in?  For example, in Section 3.1.2, we ask “Which IGMPv3 features have you implemented?” I can imagine some folks giving answers referring to what they consider IGMPv3 features (e.g. snooping proxy etc) that are not actually in the RFCs we are focusing on.  Furthermore, in the PIM survey (RFC7063) the authors actually itemise the features in RFC4601 in which they are interested.  So, to help us be able to better process the responses, I wonder if we should itemise the features that we are trying to gauge their popularity?
> 
> Which made me wonder,  other than Include list and exclude list, are there other features we should call out?
> 
> Regards,
> Femi
> 
> > On 1 May 2019, at 15:18, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > Mankamana, Timothy and myself were on the call.  Mankamana is going to email the chairs to try to determine the next steps to distributing the questionnaire.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Femi
> > 
> > 
> >> On 1 May 2019, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de>> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Ok, thats the classical excuse until we get rid of DST i guess ;-)
> >> I was only 15 minutes late, so i have no real excuse.... ;-)
> >> 
> >> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:35:08PM +0530, Anish Peter wrote:
> >>> Very sorry, I happened to join this meeting 1hr late.
> >>> 
> >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:48 PM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <
> >>> mankamis@cisco.com <mailto:mankamis@cisco.com>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Sure .
> >>>> 
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Apr 30, 2019, at 03:01, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
> >>>> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I feel we are losing some momentum with this effort and so I think
> >>>> tomorrow when we meet it???d be really good to identify exactly what remains
> >>>> to be done and set some milestones and deadlines.  Does that seem
> >>>> reasonable?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Femi
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> ---
> >> tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de>
> > 
>