Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Status?

Suneesh,

On 9 Oct 2019, at 17:36, Suneesh Babu <suneesh=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Femi,
>  
> 2.2.  Intended Recipients of Questionnaire
>  
> Are we planning to reach-out to Universities with research interest on multicast areas,

I’m not sure about universities as they are not usually implementors of IGMPv3/MLDv2.  But I suppose they could fill in the operator part of the survey if they run IGMPv3/MLDv2 in their network?

> or Open Source vendors like that of Bird, Quagga, Zebra etc 

Agree that we should definitely try to include vendors such as these.

Regards,
Femi

>  
> Regards,
> Suneesh
>  
> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Date: Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 12:43 PM
> To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
> Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Status?
>  
> Sure, done.   
>  
> Any other feedback? 
>  
> Also, does anyone already have an account with SurveyMonkey or a similar online polling organisation that we could use?
>  
> Regards,
> Femi
>  
>  
>> On 4 Oct 2019, at 17:22, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Great. In 3.1.2.1, can we include sending unicast queries/reports? It's allowed by the spec, but not sure if anyone has implemented it.
>>  
>> Stig
>>  
>>  
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 09:49 Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
>>> Please find the updated draft attached. The main change has been to identify some IGMPv3/MLDv2 features, as suggested by the WG in Montreal.  Please have a look at this list and let me know if there’s anything we should add/remove.  Any other feedback/thoughts?
>>>  
>>> Also, I’m not 100% sure of everyone’s current affiliations, email addresses etc.  So please let me know if your information is missing or out-of-dated.
>>>  
>>> Tim, thanks for being willing to help anonymise the responses.  I’ve copied part of the text about you from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7063#appendix-A <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7063*appendix-A__;Iw!8WoA6RjC81c!Q6cRVs012wIEKnzzWPRo59-_u1AFlpKtsLSxGQUtH2u5jMmiuUTUhP5wMIjvulM$>.   I’m not sure if this text is still up to date or if/how you’d like to change it.  Please send me the updated text and I can update it.
>>>  
>>> Once everyone is happy I will publish the updated draft.
>>>  
>>> The next step is to transcribe the final questions to SurveyMonkey or smoother survey tool.  Any volunteers to do this step?
>>>  
>>> Regards,
>>> Femi
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>> On 30 Sep 2019, at 23:35, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Stig,
>>>> 
>>>> I started to upgrade the draft based on the feedback from Montreal.  I will finish this off and redistribute it for comments to the volunteer team this week.
>>>> 
>>>> Once everyone is happy with it, we can proceed to the survey stage.  I agree that Survey Monkey or something similar will be an ideal means of conducting the survey.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Femi
>>>> 
>>>>> On 30 Sep 2019, at 23:26, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just wondering what the status is.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Have you looked into Survey Monkey or something similar for the reports?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Stig
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis__;!8WoA6RjC81c!Q6cRVs012wIEKnzzWPRo59-_u1AFlpKtsLSxGQUtH2u5jMmiuUTUhP5wp4GdqmA$>