Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting

Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 June 2019 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CEC1201CD for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdflxU1TLavF for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16851120457 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id a186so1465638vsd.7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=paaXFffylL6DFYGlJyk8LL0um3IXVt5re4y634LSFLA=; b=HCq1vigaQ10ZnsOQjM4pBKIC/f3/v62NTdf8EjPb+W0a6q5uzjE86yZaoDY/rMnHOa SUqVDhExN2cxDpVsUV99dzY4XV6zHmo9RpeMgFVamLZEgMphrQ1bvU5OTQO+S0OqyrSn UPKNP6KS208lPHQ6Gnuc3nLrK7/PcwfVsdDKmw0X8vwKaSBwxZeNVyWoW+haPfZ7QNMM Jng0rFWIzWrXkE7xAYrLm7FVgL3xC9gNDs1q1vXbxARYdAkiOwDNgYKBEMvSpppYqBs5 Te/MwFUkv/e5xXRdPxe6YxcFaBPjZtNjGyOUCPkexv2w8fkvgFFANeC5aYag+cb6RDNX mM9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=paaXFffylL6DFYGlJyk8LL0um3IXVt5re4y634LSFLA=; b=nLzZxprQLZqQa8/6bn59u7PxGcWknac03+EkBp6IIlzcn3Pgmrlz/nDp0P47ib/VZX kL4j9/t8aq4DXgjPFIL4InNGqUcNiS9hxZRnYk7a7oZ6T7ubsDJ6qjwNCUnqthG6iIRA dMgQEbR3oRh8mPltvuxRUH+jY9nKXjEGkimdrIm8hW6PEGrqCLuI4J4POS14kAzyN7CJ EhVYQgnc4H1fYd9m9XW0KG57Dsti3ipJDUiRIESuDat54Bn6AQcs4pLOp2jw6aSRtz72 oN47u99sMI/RNnELAkFTNIN0UR48g1coOAuHC+t1fMPF0DTVx0qpbk7sQSEHUnCiv91z b2/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWjYAjoZNSnrFY4u7moJY/WpvQCLELHz/9cUDwKZ/iFARgD4ZZR FSfZfkarNmrQWJDV75VNK8x2tLgOLWmMJTnRXQA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIyS/7tqlXYIndwm/dqUr/8AN4Go8FAMZf0zJ30aStd/1CV8LG44BO9nKHSzw6cMz9OZWF/SV1NfV3xI4Naqk=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:7dd8:: with SMTP id y207mr2957236vsc.67.1561553170202; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:ab0:2b95:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7595DE2E-ECFE-4C90-A261-6680EFB0FFE6@cisco.com>
References: <94764FD1-AA9D-475F-A888-ADCF941C0565@arista.com> <9516CE1F-999A-4841-9D77-ABD64C642BE3@cisco.com> <CAA6qS9qGB+zm30nm-Or=8oMSQBpLqV=XeJ68Z3h84T-LWX2fxA@mail.gmail.com> <20190501141529.akjsqlqh64x3qnmf@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5C363D02-6913-4672-82F6-309E10C3E03C@arista.com> <5B00E7A8-F32E-48AC-8CBA-6E0441CD7001@arista.com> <LEJPR01MB037769D389C1533F6D66B98E98140@LEJPR01MB0377.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <C5547659-1C5A-403E-AC4E-0E266B537984@arista.com> <7595DE2E-ECFE-4C90-A261-6680EFB0FFE6@cisco.com>
From: Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:16:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA6qS9oxRVFu9zr3fFp_AShfLwb8FwKYpE8ZpLC5v4ZDHfAxdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
Cc: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>, "N.Leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, "tte@cs.fau.de" <tte@cs.fau.de>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000020528058c396e22"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/p5LvGaNyeZXLI7IpQltfLBFuaFI>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:46:14 -0000

I am on my commute right now. I will be late.


On Monday, June 17, 2019, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <mankamis@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Sorry guys, I was in cisco live whole week.
>
> Thanks
> Mankamana
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 6:13 AM
> To: "N.Leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
> Cc: "tte@cs.fau.de" <tte@cs.fau.de>de>, "anish.ietf@gmail.com" <
> anish.ietf@gmail.com>gt;, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>rg>,
> "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
>
>     It seems no one else is joining the call.  Perhaps we can discuss the
> best next steps on this list then….
>
>     Can you please reply to the last couple of emails from myself and Nic
> so we can make some progress?
>
>     Regards,
>     Femi
>
>     > On 3 Jun 2019, at 13:45, N.Leymann@telekom.de wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > In Section 3.2.1 (Deployment Status) I guess under "4." It should
> read "deployed?" instead of "Implemented:".
>     >
>     > I think giving some more details on the features makes sense. I
> personally also see IGMP snooping/proxying as a feature
>     > (on our home gateways) even if those are not part of the protocol
> itself.
>     >
>     > regards
>     >
>     > Nic
>     >
>     > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     > Von: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von
> Olufemi Komolafe
>     > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2019 01:39
>     > An: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
>     > Cc: Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com>om>; igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org;
> Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <mankamis@cisco.com>
>     > Betreff: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
>     >
>     > I think we should try to progress this work over the coming weeks.
> Hopefully we can meet tomorrow and discuss next steps.
>     >
>     > I re-read the latest version of the questionnaire and was wondering
> if we should spell out what features in the RFCs we are interested in?  For
> example, in Section 3.1.2, we ask “Which IGMPv3 features have you
> implemented?” I can imagine some folks giving answers referring to what
> they consider IGMPv3 features (e.g. snooping proxy etc) that are not
> actually in the RFCs we are focusing on.  Furthermore, in the PIM survey
> (RFC7063) the authors actually itemise the features in RFC4601 in which
> they are interested.  So, to help us be able to better process the
> responses, I wonder if we should itemise the features that we are trying to
> gauge their popularity?
>     >
>     > Which made me wonder,  other than Include list and exclude list, are
> there other features we should call out?
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Femi
>     >
>     >> On 1 May 2019, at 15:18, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Mankamana, Timothy and myself were on the call.  Mankamana is going
> to email the chairs to try to determine the next steps to distributing the
> questionnaire.
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >> Femi
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>> On 1 May 2019, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> Ok, thats the classical excuse until we get rid of DST i guess ;-)
> I
>     >>> was only 15 minutes late, so i have no real excuse.... ;-)
>     >>>
>     >>> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:35:08PM +0530, Anish Peter wrote:
>     >>>> Very sorry, I happened to join this meeting 1hr late.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:48 PM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <
>     >>>> mankamis@cisco.com> wrote:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>> Sure .
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>> On Apr 30, 2019, at 03:01, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
>     >>>>> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> I feel we are losing some momentum with this effort and so I
> think
>     >>>>> tomorrow when we meet it???d be really good to identify exactly
>     >>>>> what remains to be done and set some milestones and deadlines.
>     >>>>> Does that seem reasonable?
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> Regards,
>     >>>>>> Femi
>     >>>>>> --
>     >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>     >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>     >>>>> --
>     >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>     >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>     >>>>>
>     >>>
>     >>>> --
>     >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>     >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> --
>     >>> ---
>     >>> tte@cs.fau.de
>     >>
>     >
>     > --
>     > Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     > Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>
>
>
>