Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Initial version of Questionnaire

Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com> Thu, 07 March 2019 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C5A126DFA for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:36:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yuScOyWDMEvB for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8191228B7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D68D4932AC0775157EB2 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 19:35:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 19:35:56 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.29]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.10]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:35:52 -0800
From: Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
To: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Initial version of Questionnaire
Thread-Index: AQHU1RJRhyH3Zgl+GkuKpNmQvF6LUKYAhhcQ
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 19:35:52 +0000
Message-ID: <8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CEBEDA4@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <16B07F66-593E-42D8-A8FE-FBEDCE94650F@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <16B07F66-593E-42D8-A8FE-FBEDCE94650F@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.247.118]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CEBEDA4sjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/pgOhEtYqEruRFNbSpE-Zoi7cIpE>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Initial version of Questionnaire
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 19:36:02 -0000

Hi Mankamana,

Looking good. Please consider making the following changes:

       3- Do you know if your implementation is based on [RFC3376]

MM- Instead: “Is your implementation based on [RFC3376]?”

       4- Do you know if lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] is deployed in your network ?

MM- Instead: “Is lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] deployed in your network ?
       7- Does any application uses Exclude mode with source list for MLDv2 ?
                                                   ^^^
MM-use

       8- Which part of IGMPv3 RFC 3376 is used more often ?

MM-Fairly wide open question. Perhaps that’s what you want. But the reader may need some guidance by following the existing question with something like “ex: INCLUDE/EXCLUDE source filtering, socket filtering, etc”

       10-Does your network still has deployment for IGMPv1 [RFC1112]?
                                                        ^^^

MM- Instead: “Does your network still have IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?”

Thanks,
mike

From: Igmp-mld-bis [mailto:igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 10:20 AM
To: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
Subject: [Igmp-mld-bis] Initial version of Questionnaire

Hi Team,
Please find the initial version of draft.  Attaching original nroff too, but you can optionally provide comment in text file directly, I can make the edit in nroff file.

Thanks
Mankamana