Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

[Olufemi Komolafe <[e-mail]>]

Cool… let’s meet outside Laurier at 1pm in that case.

See you then,
Femi

> On 23 Jul 2019, at 11:41, Hitoshi Asaeda <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I guess I'm also fine at 1pm.
> 
> 
>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:36, Timothy Winters <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> I can be free at 1.
>> 
>> ~Tim
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Perhaps we can meet at 1pm then if that works better?  Perhaps Tim will be free by then too?
>> 
>> We can meet on the first floor, perhaps at the entrance to Laurier?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Femi
>> 
>>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 11:30, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> How long do you think ? 12:30 ?
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:28:50AM -0400, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:
>>>> Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon.
>>>> But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join.
>>>> Sorry about that.
>>>> 
>>>> Hitoshi
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote:
>>>>>> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal?  If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I???ll be there too.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself.  Anyone else?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then?  Say at noon?  Anyone that does not suit?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'll be there.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update.
>>>>>>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hitoshi
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ===from here===
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.  Questionnaire for Network Operators
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Contact Email: [e-mail]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.1.  Deployment Status
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network?  And
>>>>>>>> for how long has it been deployed?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1.  IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.  IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.  IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 4.  Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 5.  MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 6.  MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 7.  Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.2.  Deployment Specifics
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1.  Which IGMPv3 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>>>>>   list in use?)
>>>>>>>>    Membership-report for SSM
>>>>>>>>    No filter function is used.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.  Which MLDv2 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>>>>>   list in use?)
>>>>>>>>    Membership-report for SSM
>>>>>>>>    No filter function is used.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.  Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between
>>>>>>>>   different IGMP versions?  (Between which IGMP versions?)  (What
>>>>>>>>   is your experience with this fallback mechanism?)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    No
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 4.  Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor)
>>>>>>>>   implementations for your deployment?  (Have you encountered any
>>>>>>>>   inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst
>>>>>>>>   differing implementations?)  (What are your concerns about these
>>>>>>>>   issues?)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   No
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.3.  Deployment Perspectives
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1.  What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>>>>>   Specifying Source for Multicast
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.  What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>>>>>   None
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.  What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to
>>>>>>>>   update these documents?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ===to here===
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to
>>>>>>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Who else is coming ?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Toerless
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Mankamana
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <[e-mail]> on behalf of Timothy Winters <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=[e-mail]>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ~Tim
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> ---
>>> [e-mail]
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>> 
>> -- 
>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> 
> -- 
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis