Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BE712036E for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dncDVCAvm4FI for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63D212025F for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id a93so20718364pla.7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3G9QqBHW2rNh5p99kCKTsY4JJE49BasZPjhoEqwv5D8=; b=C3D2RYLWHcHvUn6jeU6bz+4IV8ZSuVRfMM7DdBlyELwDNVBxKunpgafq1mn5TsdWss CZVUR/a3CE8otGwUxMTiVOxgkpjesAt5VyKNvxG1chAEIrQ7Sxd8nlYQT9PheUqNMgUq Pq3aYirn12Mi/hrkZ4r9Oo+BQ2AxSQj0vBI1aaiSrQgUsDgKWkJP1v/EGcKZLAmt/aTh SBvyQ28Yo3j4Ycc20I7fq0QwXq/zmT9kTgCCbV6p283Kq9g/xmiRjFWNq7No/6qz0ivU J37R6VGaYib9qCYMwJCVlieI/fN0hxF8xTbRvX16iyBZeWIiCXSlC9vshUCu1RlfOxwo Pplw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3G9QqBHW2rNh5p99kCKTsY4JJE49BasZPjhoEqwv5D8=; b=VZ2huH1VRqyYzNvmrpdVjAb8Ff4NvLaJ+lmA7xORAPZLbZVMhiCOAhtxOtqKewP3Gi z+GplxJI9Za2x/kHfSbsUkh4tTRgJKaycc657HPQpxRnZr72rqWwFPVHjADUWbyUqeEj 9DfYcTVzqjLKT0Qag57BWzIzBFS08H00pA6ZFkoNw7wiHzZU6FWQOJref/uLNOiiXSp5 lVF9UR5dE64iVW8XJVmRqSXdKqr/cYlTYwjZXKh4B3l/VRoB7MchSlq3NdRSAlw6CkB8 KvGBVW2zL0iEs6s//DjIKIRTq/gDKWMfacrK63dhJTs3U3WtAhs2uEX8H8Hw0hXgrLUD 1gQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXYN6NJkxy0uyux2MO9Kw6LMPV8Hv54qIUeUv05axYl7sFrLYNq JbEhsGave9dbQJuA0ktYHtQ0nWsPgaZ4ff0k7HWu+RkfC9yYWhDMbFMxtFHFhS+Ay38mQI5E5ZT AT8R3zFdcreAlfNa1XQPqZnSMScD5fCCDfwG5DfaQsu0UE9aWykLF0RaDoC3N6LRPcEUf0/nKpI VTAeNAi0ITsQtB3sM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzPodPx/yoATTmcoKsXhqL+FRR0Fyk+7W8f2T3YvRcZMDuBYkQLoz3iBqDoOsfr7g/MFN1QA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:be03:: with SMTP id r3mr82066071pls.156.1563896573360; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:a0:4001:100::1ac? ([2620:a0:4001:100::1ac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm44139028pfd.127.2019.07.23.08.42.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F79C8AB-6F6C-4FA7-A40D-8E0938FC95D6@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:42:50 -0400
Cc: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <60C02619-C3F9-469C-B67C-9D57E98057A8@arista.com>
References: <F7E6E464-A65B-4920-91FA-52FE71F2FB87@arista.com> <CAOSSMjVLbQ2znHoMm6QC9sJLHM24ngDHZbp2cX_fxnA8fMJKGQ@mail.gmail.com> <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com> <20190716195934.rty724quanksz2hp@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F9B56DCD-5D7C-4DBA-BBD6-0A9C2039E34F@ieee.org> <4767384C-D17E-4E37-A264-CE783376F066@arista.com> <E46F8822-8F47-40DF-95D1-98BE7A956697@arista.com> <20190723152412.xls7ocfnwmlnvkj3@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B4F0C12E-A5B0-4014-ADE2-F61775241B91@ieee.org> <20190723153018.mij7szy36o4yosot@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <0594C8D3-5ACE-4B29-B740-DFFCDCB9EED4@arista.com> <CAOSSMjWzW9E2po6bYL5WkcpL8xyvi8V4q_OcmnyD3Rwut8rXWQ@mail.gmail.com> <0F79C8AB-6F6C-4FA7-A40D-8E0938FC95D6@ieee.org>
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Info: arista,google_mail,monitor
X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Sent: true
X-Gm-Spam: 0
X-Gm-Phishy: 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/spANknA7hN9bXVGIUVHhmak2zIE>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:43:05 -0000

Cool… let’s meet outside Laurier at 1pm in that case.

See you then,
Femi

> On 23 Jul 2019, at 11:41, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote:
> 
> I guess I'm also fine at 1pm.
> 
> 
>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:36, Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> I can be free at 1.
>> 
>> ~Tim
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> Perhaps we can meet at 1pm then if that works better?  Perhaps Tim will be free by then too?
>> 
>> We can meet on the first floor, perhaps at the entrance to Laurier?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Femi
>> 
>>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 11:30, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> How long do you think ? 12:30 ?
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:28:50AM -0400, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:
>>>> Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon.
>>>> But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join.
>>>> Sorry about that.
>>>> 
>>>> Hitoshi
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote:
>>>>>> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal?  If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I???ll be there too.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself.  Anyone else?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then?  Say at noon?  Anyone that does not suit?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'll be there.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update.
>>>>>>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hitoshi
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ===from here===
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.  Questionnaire for Network Operators
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.1.  Deployment Status
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network?  And
>>>>>>>> for how long has it been deployed?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1.  IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.  IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.  IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 4.  Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 5.  MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 6.  MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 7.  Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.2.  Deployment Specifics
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1.  Which IGMPv3 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>>>>>   list in use?)
>>>>>>>>    Membership-report for SSM
>>>>>>>>    No filter function is used.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.  Which MLDv2 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>>>>>   list in use?)
>>>>>>>>    Membership-report for SSM
>>>>>>>>    No filter function is used.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.  Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between
>>>>>>>>   different IGMP versions?  (Between which IGMP versions?)  (What
>>>>>>>>   is your experience with this fallback mechanism?)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    No
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 4.  Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor)
>>>>>>>>   implementations for your deployment?  (Have you encountered any
>>>>>>>>   inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst
>>>>>>>>   differing implementations?)  (What are your concerns about these
>>>>>>>>   issues?)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   No
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.2.3.  Deployment Perspectives
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1.  What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>>>>>   Specifying Source for Multicast
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.  What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>>>>>   None
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.  What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to
>>>>>>>>   update these documents?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ===to here===
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to
>>>>>>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Who else is coming ?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Toerless
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Mankamana
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ~Tim
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> ---
>>> tte@cs.fau.de
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>> 
>> -- 
>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> 
> -- 
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis