Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E4B1208C1 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 18:50:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csJp9UvpCB37 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 18:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4FF12092C for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 18:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id k7so6977624pll.1 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:50:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=nd+osGnAtYHqcXzuYt150t2AtjjD6Q3UKNBVcRK0Cqs=; b=Pw2HihJ/u5UAA+1PlobeVgCi7leLTTf5GcCdggsyPfBjXa7cuxFJb+sLL3/4Jr9M1Y 7HH/unvkfo0Ens0uVOmP4qUMv1T5nsWZs1CRvRz4vtf7RdRPn1+dg4DJxApFNne2tX9f Tj4082feeggCYAszrR4/DfompWq2wWeiW7DMNkM90nQ8lVwvg2V4XgQ9uH/4a2a8nzHa 7ispnYUF+8kdCPmH4tMS3RV1KKry6xAiUhUmEzUzWwGmfHiUQSmppA8kmutHrTKOMPx5 cVbsbb4Ax+n97cURwFTAYz+ycWfzzywUPdhw10hCrEQqSw5kVzV9FBsOopGlBK30bG/l QBkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=nd+osGnAtYHqcXzuYt150t2AtjjD6Q3UKNBVcRK0Cqs=; b=gZpqiGmdWV0yv7TbiGFkuvPYFSgqxTyGQ5Xh8iGkdiJmJAwhUj+XKU0ZfViT+VaSTu Yp3Qm7s7K/omNfkfc/hPbGpveX0/MWwF8902Nd7l/5+KPoUBU2yUuR3B8pi8urpIxwD2 u9hFEjLcwG6t/KVX8qDO+eUeLrbUx/sLlDrG7LitNHNaHskkKFF0EtJykXzJt4N2cqmh 37vuiNbkiujXnsY9Zpop+QfsqWu3vd776rnT3DlTYt+k6RIna9iqN4f/DLLCAMfnMOAF ZzA89R28kCqEtH+EXNgJjhqZtYSQjDFQtTYYJmnHQyKz2ESAlo9DTm6ksq9HIyCHEBT4 jYyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWox6VoL+kY0lMo9JPVoAaKsKhUCqEPJ706f+9dc75K3tQIxGAF lghLyzLGaxBz1b8ONsFwn5FYsw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtUqCQzchkhqmHTBkHBh2HF8I33ZkB6DnwQnMqi49qCtR1Xi4BBlkNujxTg0LE5j1S+uOJkw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7783:: with SMTP id o3mr24737868pll.313.1572835850344; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:50:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (host109-146-150-34.range109-146.btcentralplus.com. [109.146.150.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n62sm20284123pjc.6.2019.11.03.18.50.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:50:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
Message-Id: <05C42248-5FD8-4646-B940-0879C98002A2@arista.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B7A9B0F0-160C-492A-8FA9-F2E600F564E4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 02:50:45 +0000
In-Reply-To: <926EA47C-93EB-4A9A-874E-ECAF1087A65E@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <6C716B06-1A87-4BA0-A535-6D0073D95E22@arista.com> <C1BD52A0-7F4F-41CE-BA66-A850D1737FCF@arista.com> <31CBF61F-94A9-4F7E-BA73-20811451B01D@cisco.com> <BYAPR13MB28073A3460918E6EE4420E97F4600@BYAPR13MB2807.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAHANBtLMecXZVvprQHw6xA6HFJunDS-YcVhxUMKyHQ1qqLb7XA@mail.gmail.com> <5CB9D3E2-64A7-4D39-B67E-788A17FD6A14@jisc.ac.uk> <CE94B44B-ACDA-43D6-A054-E4E2A4193D31@arista.com> <C6AC0C7E-7ECA-4EE1-B9D2-A654C2B250EF@jisc.ac.uk> <4A654A02-88D0-42C6-9044-68E48E76290F@jisc.ac.uk> <86787B9B-02A0-4B25-9DEB-7A4A2A26E8FE@arista.com> <BYAPR13MB280753663F14B24BD54FDC97F4600@BYAPR13MB2807.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <2A40F6CF-7E6C-4C53-956D-C3CAEA376D99@jisc.ac.uk> <82014633-1BB1-4B32-83B7-95D33C010360@arista.com> <926EA47C-93EB-4A9A-874E-ECAF1087A65E@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/tE_YdEbymaNOwLNeVOYr2v2QY0Q>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 02:51:00 -0000

Thanks Tim.  I’ve made the suggested changes and posted https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-02.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-02.txt>

Regards,
Femi

> On 1 Nov 2019, at 08:22, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 31 Oct 2019, at 10:24, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 17:14, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, I’ll look on Friday or the weekend; I’m afraid work is too crazy until then.
>>> 
>>> To double check, it’s from https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-01>, right?
>>> 
>>> Also at some point we need to change it to say I now work for Jisc, which is the UK national research and education network. I’m a Visiting Fellow at the uni, but my primary work is now Jisc.
>> 
>> Thanks Tim.  The draft currently says the following about you:
>> 
>> Tim Chown has kindly agreed to anonymize the responses to this
>>    questionnaire.  Tim has considerable multicast expertise but has no
>>    direct financial interest in this matter nor ties to any of the
>>    vendors involved.  Tim works at University of Southampton in the UK
>>    and has been active in the IETF for many years.
> 
> … works at Jisc, who run the UK’s national research and education network, Janet, and has been…
> 
>> Please can you let me know what the updated text should say and I will modify it the draft.
>> 
>> Also, can I say on the draft that the survey will be carried out using Jisc survey tools? Or should I just leave it as is?  Currently it says:
>> 
>> An online survey tool such as Surveymonkey will be used in order make
>>    the submission and processing of returns as convenient as possible.
> 
> Perhaps just delete “such as SurveyMonkey” ?
> 
> Tim
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Femi
>> 
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 16:47, Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com <mailto:michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, its ready to go. Please feel free to send a note to the wg or Stig and I are happy to do it if you prefer.
>>>>  
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> mike
>>>>  
>>>> From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> 
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:31 AM
>>>> To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>>
>>>> Cc: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>>; Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com <mailto:michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>>; Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <mankamis@cisco.com <mailto:mankamis@cisco.com>>; igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com <mailto:mmcbride7@gmail.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
>>>>  
>>>> Tim,
>>>>  
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 11:54, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Hi, 
>>>>  
>>>> Jisc has a survey tools, so I think we can use that.  
>>>>  
>>>> Sounds ideal.  Thanks.
>>>>  
>>>> Once you’ve set the survey and told me estimated response numbers, I can check.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Stig & Mike, do you think the survey is ready to go out?  Perhaps we can prompt the WG for some last minute feedback before we launch it?
>>>>  
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Femi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 11:27, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 11:19, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Tim, 
>>>>  
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 07:16, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> The survey sounds good to me. 
>>>>  
>>>> We can point NANOG (and other NOGs, like UKNOF, and the R&E campus communities) at that.
>>>>  
>>>> Are we thinking text-based or using something like SurveyMonkey?
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> I think the intention is to use something like SurveyMonkey.  And I actually think it might be best for you to create an account and transpose the questions from the draft to an online tool since you are the only one that should have access to the raw responses. Is this something you are willing/able to do?
>>>>  
>>>> I’m reasonably experienced with SurveyMonkey.
>>>>  
>>>> But note that if we expect a large number of responses, or want several questions, the free version may not suffice.  Do any of us have access to a paid version?
>>>>  
>>>> I can check what Jisc might have available.
>>>>  
>>>> Tim
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Femi
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 03:04, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Hi 
>>>>  
>>>> It's not strictly needed, but I think it is helpful, and the hardest part, creating the survey, is already done. I think we should move forward.
>>>>  
>>>> Without the survey we can only speculate about what is out there. I think it is really useful data.
>>>>  
>>>> Stig
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 18:04 Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com <mailto:michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>  
>>>> I had a chat with Alyssa Cooper, here at Nanog, to discuss how best to engage the operators to move an rfc to internet standard. She recommended not doing a survey, saying its probably unnecessary. We can certainly still send it as it worked with pim-sm. Or we can simply email the nanog list (and I2 and ?) and explain our intention to move 3376/3810 to Internet standard and see if they +1.
>>>>  
>>>> What say ye?
>>>> mike
>>>>  
>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 4:25 PM
>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>; igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>>> Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>>; Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>>; Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com <mailto:mmcbride7@gmail.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
>>>>  
>>>> Done
>>>>  
>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 4:23 PM
>>>> To: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>>
>>>> Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk <mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>>, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com <mailto:mmcbride7@gmail.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
>>>>  
>>>> The naming of the drafts has been a bit messy.  We’ve had:
>>>> draft-volunteers-pim-igmp-mld-bis-00.txt
>>>> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-bis-00 
>>>> draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-00 
>>>>  
>>>> Rather than creating a new document the WG chairs suggested creating draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-01 which I have just posted.  The -00 does not have the email address of some of the co-authors including myself.  Therefore, can someone whose email address was on the previous revision and so got a notification please approve the publication?
>>>>  
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Femi
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> On 28 Oct 2019, at 01:15, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> HI,
>>>>  
>>>> I’ve posted the updated version of the draft.  I could not update the original draft which has since expired as my email address was omitted on the original draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/102921/ <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fsubmit%2Fstatus%2F102921%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C369ad59f851b49af003a08d75d3d740e%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637080390847893245&sdata=ccYFmKiyAsayOjs32YKVOlyjPpSBFCNr7PHT96MK%2BXo%3D&reserved=0>) and so I’ve simply posted a new draft which I’ve attached FYI.
>>>>  
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Femi
>>>>  
>>>> <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-update-survey-00.txt>
>>> 
>> 
>