IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Status?

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Sat, 05 October 2019 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FEE1200E9 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 00:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF_COUNT=1.112, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mvZnuZyv4K9y for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 00:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BB51200DE for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 00:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id x10so5053648pgi.5 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 00:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=JcwnO1IhrUfTXy077l2c5zkETeL4Xi+SorqAzSm/ulU=; b=LraNP258BozEaQk78sILwkWeBA2CKGx62xImfIeQTOfubO/n8QHvQ4UZsPAqncIjMV 9Ipo32H/VH0D63ACkU/uYt1T5NF+MseQMcT2kMQB04Kjd9mtVG3o9Ac5NSjiABsygLy8 bMw5PAkWaZgVCcvJjP7dTzVqHYvYzBemuhnVJWAlALalXu34BOzsxIZyeD4EBgQ0ggiC w5GiB9SYba66xLI754srDrbZVH4Vo431Nh6wCwtzluJ9zA7kLmzKHsgmLT1S1p8dOVQA oPBRxdLYY9HKwiBqIGLuodVcu+Ax78ceLtaiERDSGW2rGAHGwd8HtScmXe1/d26cYnz3 K5pA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=JcwnO1IhrUfTXy077l2c5zkETeL4Xi+SorqAzSm/ulU=; b=jN4HN2c26AyBCsc53/CJyLDS2hBn6qcFBRD7WpCMmFuTNfTsgl5519y+50Yw4SvVFO QlmSDCbZmQ85QgCOB2/rrloIRFR4lQ2TTQPLIqVKxeLd5cXvGbCuj9fWjgrNGCRoT5IJ Z+5neX+jO7UJvbddNuw6HUpFNrwWpiEwJ4Y0oca3xxZmxSGX9D+CAXEl+V4jvrTyLbJ5 fSv+gztsyWnqY0BKSZedDVnUfmw9CteprXbDO8bsIN+EPpxo5iNK42kEW5PYRcHVDia4 vEcdDmgxkFSeMDvookMOWpDpALZCbl8P0aQCkNF8W8wmbLk5iwNSb09pvN2Ab1+cJP6B qJfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXKWb+b3UmphtPG631H7I5KibDEGBg2TUsodrOmnf3A3+0R5aj/ uAZFFIHBzu7fX14/TAF1P59rHA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCzqmS9VZbqrGVKtTCMYXRTksZsK0PNc66hIAhVabarDTjHvo5YdWJHhx5awVwg8Qg9UYePA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:7c4d:: with SMTP id x74mr21428269pfc.95.1570259620951; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 00:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:a0:4001:100::1ac? ([2620:a0:4001:100::1ac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm7276209pjd.22.2019.10.05.00.13.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Oct 2019 00:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
Message-Id: <029C8912-0CE1-4714-ABD2-322AD9A0A168@arista.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CB49AFFA-9AB3-4ABF-A8DB-D909265D7A1C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:13:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtK_OSdS6n0jnP6zqJtJtQY_JeYPpzp211G4a5ZONTYkcg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
References: <CAHANBtL1f=8Cner2D2_FzvoX_cc+F1i=VfAseLQ=Hs1ASi=hUw@mail.gmail.com> <3C9BB46D-C839-4AA0-A270-DA8FBC78E135@arista.com> <ED686CBC-239C-4C5B-8582-B8A2768AD10B@arista.com> <CAHANBtK_OSdS6n0jnP6zqJtJtQY_JeYPpzp211G4a5ZONTYkcg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/zLE56fYHTv73nRosresuEgXvUZA>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Status?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 07:13:44 -0000

Sure, done.  

Any other feedback?

Also, does anyone already have an account with SurveyMonkey or a similar online polling organisation that we could use?

Regards,
Femi



> On 4 Oct 2019, at 17:22, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
> 
> Great. In 3.1.2.1, can we include sending unicast queries/reports? It's allowed by the spec, but not sure if anyone has implemented it.
> 
> Stig
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 09:49 Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
> Please find the updated draft attached. The main change has been to identify some IGMPv3/MLDv2 features, as suggested by the WG in Montreal.  Please have a look at this list and let me know if there’s anything we should add/remove.  Any other feedback/thoughts?
> 
> Also, I’m not 100% sure of everyone’s current affiliations, email addresses etc.  So please let me know if your information is missing or out-of-dated.
> 
> Tim, thanks for being willing to help anonymise the responses.  I’ve copied part of the text about you from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7063#appendix-A <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7063#appendix-A>.   I’m not sure if this text is still up to date or if/how you’d like to change it.  Please send me the updated text and I can update it.
> 
> Once everyone is happy I will publish the updated draft.
> 
> The next step is to transcribe the final questions to SurveyMonkey or smoother survey tool.  Any volunteers to do this step?
> 
> Regards,
> Femi
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30 Sep 2019, at 23:35, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com <mailto:femi@arista.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Stig,
>> 
>> I started to upgrade the draft based on the feedback from Montreal.  I will finish this off and redistribute it for comments to the volunteer team this week.
>> 
>> Once everyone is happy with it, we can proceed to the survey stage.  I agree that Survey Monkey or something similar will be an ideal means of conducting the survey.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Femi
>>> On 30 Sep 2019, at 23:26, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com <mailto:stig@venaas.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Just wondering what the status is.
>>> 
>>> Have you looked into Survey Monkey or something similar for the reports?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stig
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org <mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email