Re: [Ila] SIR [was ILA forwarding]

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 01 May 2018 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB19D126D0C; Tue, 1 May 2018 13:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6m32Cbl8Ut7l; Tue, 1 May 2018 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B83E21200B9; Tue, 1 May 2018 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 186-v6so14540639itu.0; Tue, 01 May 2018 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4hSBIKjvGIN+qYXMwRn6QiuEblN89CuW2V2Gs9/gYJc=; b=cxSq9UIbnm6Skug1coDUkmNji7aHPnVmxDbCHPgI0r8YBg9s4D3oX6leEZnVjvSCYk 2TzF+p/OmLIRCyMFo3G37xVDWtaAeA36WOgQbf1y1Q0+zEYM68CV8SO17AQ186af0/W0 cX/4hO09m86YSsObz/MSRzs3NVqAU6WRODB+IAQ/gNAeMDTp0dk/rRU9nGLduqtcEX5M 9ksPm41Xtf6SEj+NdhrAJyZcnZwzg5I7h3R8+oRfxSDJ+uJDeWHmu0ZkfwcDyE3oiis5 yvFFVJd+Ux6pRh53SNQsJMW/i/2mnjuj0rwp2FeXLknfAqHHakiFP3AIy+/yMXlDfc3w BFWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=4hSBIKjvGIN+qYXMwRn6QiuEblN89CuW2V2Gs9/gYJc=; b=W4BAvGW61u3D+R2aglgz80JfhiG5ZmjFCAO6IKSBAX9zYiyETrRjzObjdVciasm7jJ g+vgoXMCAE4eD3I7RyGArrz2yWju97e3JtNAXyUvAS1YpcbzvcCm6rYKfz5pPUr8CpGe of72fgyL+vn401PPF0gX/Wp3/Qz1x9w4BIg1MUeVLlXaYRVH/vWMCQPTzGFd0WmmEJC6 cf5+lRaWtk40+zcuIL9vEPjDpKw1WMTSFFNUckeGSbbNBAn3jKFpSB2I0O8Ih58wP2fy nN1XEH4xf6MwA1KGEtuHsTzg+QCPYJwHTL+J2uaTYTkd/oRoAqJXbx4sARuYBOLYePH6 Ko5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tA9OJg+f7Am5y7GAc0OtlWInitwjexMfrph0OuYmtl5Qx4Q4BS3 Bv25dwr9Oj4qpOhQD8BNRWpwl/H3OJfHUL4/kaY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqlu71fivSDCuZNZFWANdT5SevcpmgTnFpNO5Dkr1FAdc7WBFSzY3fapvBBVAYIXu/c9hqg5WAL/hPwVhm1a1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:72c5:: with SMTP id x188-v6mr18506599itc.118.1525208171956; Tue, 01 May 2018 13:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.192.170.54 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2018 13:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 15:56:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccHA++FXQWQ5KB7MpOhVO-umdjxCjqAgmddJ4vWEthyWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org>, ila@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004c5179056b2b3349"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ila/9YJVHKqyW1l970diCOAng0m1URI>
Subject: Re: [Ila] SIR [was ILA forwarding]
X-BeenThere: ila@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Identifier Locator Addressing <ila.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ila/>
List-Post: <mailto:ila@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 20:56:15 -0000

Hi Tom,

With SIR fixed, I wonder how do you address multi homed UEs in ILA?
Maybe you did not need it for VMs because they are not multi homed but UEs
definitely have multiple interfaces.
ILNP treats it using two different locators but same identifier which seems
reasonable.

Regards,
Behcet