[Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list
dm-list-ietf-ilc@scs.stanford.edu Mon, 13 February 2017 20:24 UTC
Return-Path: <dm-list-ietf-ilc@scs.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: ilc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ilc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E141298CE for <ilc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:24:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CisFlHb8GoJK for <ilc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (www.scs.stanford.edu [IPv6:2001:470:806d:1::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25891298CA for <ilc@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v1DKOQvv074863 for <ilc@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dm@localhost) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v1DKOQRV089581; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:24:26 -0800 (PST)
From: dm-list-ietf-ilc@scs.stanford.edu
To: ilc@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:24:26 -0800
Message-ID: <87mvdpon45.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ilc/UTZGJ5mnwRWuKxULjUckYWjYikw>
Subject: [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list
X-BeenThere: ilc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2017-05-14 PDT <mazieres-55gj72eaqw2pcqj8rgxsi8nvz2@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
List-Id: "Discussion of mechanisms and applications for Internet-level consensus." <ilc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ilc>, <mailto:ilc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ilc/>
List-Post: <mailto:ilc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ilc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ilc>, <mailto:ilc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:24:29 -0000
Thanks for subscribing to the Internet-level consensus mailing list. Now that we've got 50+ people on the mailing list, let's start the discussion. Consensus is the task of a agreeing on a particular value among multiple valid inputs in a distributed system. This problem is at the heart of fault-tolerant replication and distributed transaction processing. An Internet-level consensus mechanism is one that accommodates the decentralized nature of the Internet to agree on values without relying on a centralized authority for configuration. Specifically, the goal is to achieve consensus in settings where there may be Internet-wide benefit from agreement, yet the security concerns of participants and the multi-national nature of the network preclude any globally-acceptable consortium in which to concentrate trust. We created this mailing list on the hypothesis that there's an unmet need for this kind of Internet-level consensus. So if you have applications for such a technology, please speak up. Other good questions to discuss: What kind of properties do you think Internet-level consensus should have? What is the best form for an IETF contribution in the area (i.e., a single global service, vs. a protocol with many instances)? Are there enhancements/improvements to other Internet technologies that would make it easier or more efficient to achieve consensus? And finally, of course, what other questions would you like to see discussed on the list? David
- [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list dm-list-ietf-ilc
- Re: [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list Kyle Rose
- Re: [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list Tom Ritter
- Re: [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list Tao Effect
- Re: [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ilc] Welcome to the ILC list Tao Effect