IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-11.txt

Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com> Fri, 05 August 2011 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.newman@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236E021F85EE for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5VI2rJ1JnCp7 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sca-ea-mail-4.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-4.Sun.COM [192.18.43.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0821F865E for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brmsunmail1-sfbay.uk.sun.com ([10.79.11.100]) by sca-ea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p75NRvrV005713; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:28:17 GMT
Received: from gotmail.us.oracle.com (gotmail.us.oracle.com [10.133.152.174]) by brmsunmail1-sfbay.uk.sun.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id p75NRu0k051405; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:27:57 GMT
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Received: from [10.145.239.205] (nifty-silver.us.oracle.com [10.145.239.205]) by gotmail.us.oracle.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u5-4.01 64bit (built May 4 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0LPH00G3NAIIYO00@gotmail.us.oracle.com>; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:27:53 -0700
From: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
To: Jiankang Yao <healthyao@gmail.com>
Message-id: <51207C7682EC63DF8CB98DA1@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90>
In-reply-to: <DBA3AA49AFED46E88CFD08F6CE393A57@LENOVO47E041CF>
References: <20110708012352.14365.62590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <511610891.05212@cnnic.cn> <DE4565887EBE42A9A6E8F987CEC6BCA7@LENOVO47E041CF> <F9F980ED2E4A14AD798EB0D8@dhcp-1764.meeting.ietf.org> <B963AB1A-39F2-4890-BAAC-DA47F6E54DF2@afilias.info> <512413510.07777@cnnic.cn> <DBA3AA49AFED46E88CFD08F6CE393A57@LENOVO47E041CF>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
Cc: ima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-11.txt
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:28:00 -0000

--On August 5, 2011 12:03:00 +0800 Jiankang Yao <healthyao@gmail.com> wrote:
> in the end of  section  3.2.  The UTF8SMTPbis Extension
>
> how about adding one sentence below?
>
>
> If the UTF8SMTPbis-aware SMTP servers try to support DSN[RFC 3461] , they
> MUST support  RFC5337bis.
>
>
> does such sentence satisify your expectation?

I don't know what "try to support" means in a spec. How about:

If a UTF8SMTPbis-aware SMTP server advertises the Delivery Status 
Notification [RFC3461] extension, it MUST implement RFC 5337bis.

		- Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email