Re: [EAI] WG Last Call to RFC5336bis, RFC5335bis, RFC5337bis

["John Levine" <[e-mail]>]

I read all three, 5335bis and 5337bis are ready to go.

With some trepidation, I ask one question about 5336bis:

In section 3.2, third paragraph, it still says that without EAI, the
client "... MUST NOT transmit a mail message containing
internationalized mail headers as described in [RFC5335bis] at any
level within its MIME structure ...".  Back in March, we discussed
this and I was under the impression we agreed to remove the
requirement that you need EAI to send a message/global MIME part.  See
the messages around this one:

 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima/current/msg04078.html

My goal is not to reopen the can of worms, but to clarify whether

A) we didn't agree to the change and the current wording is OK, or

B) we did agree to the change, and the draft should delete the "at
any level" language.

R's,
John