Re: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6857 (5419)

=?utf-8?B?IuCkheCknOCkr0DgpKHgpL7gpJ/gpL4u4KSt4KS+4KSw4KSkIg==?=<ajay@xgenplus.com> Sat, 14 July 2018 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ajay@xgenplus.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE3A1310E1 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, FROM_MISSP_XPRIO=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9Au6eDdqkaG for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.tbms.in (a.tbms.in [202.157.72.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85C21277D2 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From 202.157.83.44[202.157.83.44] by [202.157.83.51] [mx2.datainfosys.com] [mta] with SMTP id ../InBoxS/20180714/21/59071.04374878204(1531585221280); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 16:20:21 +0000
Received: From 202.157.87.20[202.157.87.20] by [202.157.87.20] [DataMailApp-2] [mta] with SMTP id 34957.35420104843(1531585220265); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 16:20:20 +0000
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 21:50:20 +0530 (IST)
From: =?utf-8?B?IuCkheCknOCkr0DgpKHgpL7gpJ/gpL4u4KSt4KS+4KSw4KSkIg==?=<ajay@xgenplus.com>
To: rfc errata system <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fujiwara@jprs.co.jp, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, john-ietf@jck.com, jyee@afilias.info
Cc: ima@ietf.org
Message-ID: <576387156.154081531585220260.JavaMail.root@DataMailApp-2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15403_310139775.1531585220258"
XMessage-Id: XGenPlusMessageID:15315852123753896
X-Mailer: XGen Plus INSTANT MESSAGING SYSTEM
X-ScheduledMail: FALSE
X-ScheduledDate: 14/07/2018 16:20:00
X-Followup: false
X-FollowupTotal: 0
X-PersonalisedTag: FALSE
X-Signature: FALSE
X-ReplyAwaited: FALSE
X-SendType: REPLYALL
X-SentFromIP: 202.157.76.62
X-SentFromDate: 14/07/2018 16:20:00
X-BrowserType: Google Chrome
X-Priority: 3
X-Right:
X_XGEN_DLP: NO
X-Alias-Id: xn--l1b0cxc@xn--c2bd1gb.xn--h2brj9c<ajay@xgenplus.com>
X-Tag: 0
X_Xgen_Delivery_Report: no
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ima/8Toflx0hKZYVEA6PTwiwJWGIQW4>
Subject: Re: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6857 (5419)
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ima/>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 16:20:25 -0000

Thanks for Posting. Requires the discussion. Happy to participate and contribute my bit. Thanks.Dr. Ajay Data
 
 
 
 
From: RFC Errata System   MailId : [83067465]To: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp,ben@nostrum.com,aamelnikov@fastmail.fm,adam@nostrum.com,john-ietf@jck.com,jyee@afilias.infoCc: ima@ietf.org,rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgSubject: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6857 (5419)Date: 14 Jul 2018 03:23:52 AM  The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6857,"Post-Delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages".--------------------------------------You may review the report below and at:http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5419--------------------------------------Type: TechnicalReported by: Peter Occil Section: 3.2.1Original Text-------------From:    Sender:    To:    Cc:    Bcc:    Reply-To:    Resent-From:    Resent-Sender:    Resent-To:    Resent-Cc:    Resent-Bcc:    Resent-Reply-To:    Return-Path:    Disposition-Notification-To:Corrected Text--------------From:    Sender:    To:    Cc:    Bcc:    Reply-To:    Resent-From:    Resent-Sender:    Resent-To:    Resent-Cc:    Resent-Bcc:    Resent-Reply-To:    Disposition-Notification-To:Notes-----Under RFC 5322 sec. 3.6.7, the Return-Path header field contains no production named "address", but at most a production named "angle-addr", which does not accept display names, for one. An update to this RFC could discuss this header field in its own section.Instructions:-------------This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, pleaseuse "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified orrejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. --------------------------------------RFC6857 (draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-08)--------------------------------------Title : Post-Delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email MessagesPublication Date : March 2013Author(s) : K. FujiwaraCategory : PROPOSED STANDARDSource : Email Address InternationalizationArea : ApplicationsStream : IETFVerifying Party : IESG_______________________________________________IMA mailing listIMA@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima.Do not Remove:[HID]20180714032352485[-HID]
[XGENFOOTER]

[-XGENFOOTER]