[EAI] 81 IETF EAI meeting minutes

"Jiankang Yao" <healthyao@gmail.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <healthyao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD3921F8BA9 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.819, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBkolZicum11 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA66021F8BB6 for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so11633762pzk.26 for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=hVyXIJ8KI6uh7O2VqpKurG4gqmA3KjH+Azj6BZu/tAg=; b=EwubmDj0fNZEQdQx5wqJxnMDD3ZzBCtzL7b5tsXccyryqjLF8lYD7bSFC4blRl/g0m AzWwWaoL/2SeKjZ7aOfMu93N7iPCQvXyHKlsZTT7a58+SktJ3YdoFBQG93fUkZrH/aJC fjw5LPTTNqUnY/4YKxBGip+H+Xggo+kyBee/I=
Received: by 10.68.31.8 with SMTP id w8mr4812020pbh.379.1312251493892; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LENOVO47E041CF ([218.241.111.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm1050249pbm.87.2011.08.01.19.18.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B41F7A50742454987AC87127305F889@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: Jiankang Yao <healthyao@gmail.com>
To: ima@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:18:09 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0304_01CC50FD.7A6FFF90"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
Subject: [EAI] 81 IETF EAI meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 02:18:15 -0000

Dear all,


Pls see the initial 81 IETF EAI meeting minutes below or attached.

Pls kindly give your comments before 8 Aug.


Jiankang Yao

------------------------------------------- 
Meeting 
 
Email Address Internationalization (EAI) WG minutes 
 
IETF 81, Tuesday, July 26, 2011
0900-1130 
Room: 2103
Chairs: John Klensin  
       Joseph Yee
Scribe: Andrew Sullivan
Minutes: Jiankang Yao
 

Agenda Bashing 
- none 
 
Discussion Summary 
 
SMTP-bis (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-11): 
a)This draft needs a little refinement but is nearly
   ready for Working Group Last Call
b)New version of this draft should be submitted before 11 Aug.
c)The Working Group Last Call will be issued around 11 Aug.
 
Header-bis (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-11): 
a) Tentative consensus results:
- General support for UTF-8 in Message-IDs
- General support for including important commentary
  material from earlier versions in one or more appendices
  to the current organization of the draft.
**NOTE**
These results will be considered final if objections are
not raised on the list with new substantive arguments
before 8 August
b) New version of this draft (-12) should be submitted
around 11 Aug assuming that the consensus isn't
overturned by the possible objection 
c) Barry committed to review after revision -12 is up 
d) The Working Group Last Call will be issued around 11
Aug.

 
DSN-bis (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-03): 
a) No known issues
b) More extensive reviews are needed by more people
c) Chris Newman committed to review it
d) The Working Group Last Call will be issued around 11 Aug.
 
POP-bis (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-02): 
a) No known issues 
b) editors need more review from WG (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/slides/eai-2.pdf)

IMAP-bis (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5738bis-01): 
a) editors need more review from WG (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/slides/eai-2.pdf)
b) The ABNF syntax in section 2 needs some updates
c) few editorials issues remain
d) few participants are concerned about IMAP complexity, and would love to have working 

implementation to back the draft


Post-delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages 
(draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-02) 
a) Fujiwara presented slides on EAI consensus from IETF Beijing meeting and the new ABNF in 

current draft
b) Editors need more inputs for next revision
c) The WG discussed how to proceed to incorporate a provision
for group syntax (and hence no usable addresses for replies) at
backward pointing address.  There are two logical possibilities:
- (1) create a narrowly-focused update to 5322 outside
EAI, get it approved, and then have popimap-downgrade
refer to it.
- (2) update 5322 as part of the EAI work

There was general agreement that it was appropriate and
efficient to make the changes within the EAI WG effort. 
Chairs will discuss procedures with ADs offline as needed.

d) Chairs will have offline discussion (with IESG) regarding Downgraded-* headers
e) Editors need more review from WG (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/slides/eai-2.pdf)
f) John Klensin committed to help draft the initial text regarding Message-ID

 
 
A.O.B
a)ISOC Quebec chapter president offers some remarks about culture & internationalized 
 
environment and thanks the work of EAI
 

reminder: 
Anyone who committed to review docs 
should do so as promised. 
----------------------------------------