[EAI] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6857 (5419)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 26 July 2018 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828A713116A; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-Kr5s4H_Vwx; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18754131162; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C55EDB80932; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: poccil14@gmail.com, fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, iesg@ietf.org, ima@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20180726142545.C55EDB80932@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ima/KX_QJq3Z4xLsX4AKbNSBgkWLQrs>
Subject: [EAI] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6857 (5419)
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ima/>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:25:57 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6857, "Post-Delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5419

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>;
Date Reported: 2018-07-13
Held by: Alexey Melnikov (IESG)

Section: 3.2.1

Original Text
-------------
From:
   Sender:
   To:
   Cc:
   Bcc:
   Reply-To:
   Resent-From:
   Resent-Sender:
   Resent-To:
   Resent-Cc:
   Resent-Bcc:
   Resent-Reply-To:
   Return-Path:
   ^^^^^^^^^^^
   Disposition-Notification-To:


Corrected Text
--------------
From:
   Sender:
   To:
   Cc:
   Bcc:
   Reply-To:
   Resent-From:
   Resent-Sender:
   Resent-To:
   Resent-Cc:
   Resent-Bcc:
   Resent-Reply-To:
   Disposition-Notification-To:


Notes
-----
Under RFC 5322 sec. 3.6.7, the Return-Path header field contains no production named "address", but at most a production named "angle-addr", which does not accept display names, for one.  An update to this RFC could discuss this header field in its own section.

I agree with John Levine's comment on this:
This erratum is correct.  I would suggest hold for update, since it is not 
my impression that this flavor of downgrade is used very much if at all.


--------------------------------------
RFC6857 (draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Post-Delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages
Publication Date    : March 2013
Author(s)           : K. Fujiwara
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Email Address Internationalization
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG