[EAI] UTF=x IMAP capabilities

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 15 November 2011 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC29111E809C for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AaL66TR3T7cT for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E82A21F8EAD for <ima@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfl15 with SMTP id fl15so431747vcb.31 for <ima@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=adhMtcYeQ5DmUkZNfsvogf3HIhP6+bE8zwfB55G3c5M=; b=XUZ4CXXysbXyZwETMMx0xD6ceO91TXhSknXPZy1EG/Eb7KA7BU1TZdr4k4P4B0yL3Y djbm8SU+uWiwma0WOxAQoH21MPBDKfWJ7lmyTUk0XyoksQ3JT08uvV9XFDUUFS+ci0Op 8T0JTixU3xZaWpBPqoJ0gCDqPvVSxp+8woLAA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.178.130 with SMTP id bm2mr16883970qab.17.1321362831966; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.184.20 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:13:51 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: r-XsqJWeknRAVXCbx40oFqBSqwc
Message-ID: <CALaySJLZaQH0Pcys561UhU6jTdEnqpAFrnMcY6oeV1SpPD-aRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: ima@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [EAI] UTF=x IMAP capabilities
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:13:54 -0000

At today's EAI meeting, I took an action item to start a short
discussion about the various UTF8=x capabilities in the IMAP doc (
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eai-5738bis ).  We've agreed to
remove UTF8=USER and UTF8=APPEND, so I wanted to analyze the remaining
ones, and look at the implications.

UTF8=ACCEPT says that the server accepts UTF8 strings and allows
selection of mailboxes in UTF8 mode.  It's the basic "I support the
EAI UTF8 stuff" capability.  Good.

I presume the intent is that when a client that supports EAI talks to
a server that supports EAI, it will just use the UTF8 commands
throughout, yes?

Given that, I see little value in UTF8=ALL.  This says "all mailboxes
can be UTF8 SELECTed." What value is there to a client in knowing
that?  I suppose it can eliminate the need to use the UTF8 options in
the extended LIST command...  and there's no benefit at all if
extended LIST isn't supported.  I suggest that we also eliminate
UTF8=ALL.

That leaves UTF8=ONLY, which is reasonable to leave.  And so we have
three cases:

1.  No EAI support (no UTF8=x capabilities listed).

2.  EAI support, but also support of non-UTF8 versions (UTF8=ACCEPT).

3.  EAI support, and it's all there is (UTF8=ONLY).

So I suggest that we just spell it out that way, and make UTF8=ACCEPT
and UTF8=ONLY be mutually exclusive: there can be one, the other, or
neither, but never both.

Barry