[EAI] [Errata Verified] RFC6855 (4029)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 23 February 2016 23:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985821B375C; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:49:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBkbEbIrPkx5; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E9A1B3736; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1BD44180005; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:49:16 -0800 (PST)
To: chris.newman@oracle.com, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, chris.newman@oracle.com, shenshuo@cnnic.cn
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160223234916.1BD44180005@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:49:16 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ima/NXWV-Fl3t4XLE-KT3kLnXuGjWNU>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, ima@ietf.org
Subject: [EAI] [Errata Verified] RFC6855 (4029)
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ima/>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:49:50 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6855, "IMAP Support for UTF-8". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6855&eid=4029 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com> Date Reported: 2014-06-27 Verified by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Once an IMAP client has enabled UTF-8 support with the "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command, it MUST NOT issue a "SEARCH" command that contains a charset specification. If an IMAP server receives such a "SEARCH" command in that situation, it SHOULD reject the command with a "BAD" response (due to the conflicting charset labels). Corrected Text -------------- Once an IMAP client has enabled UTF-8 support with the "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command, it MUST NOT issue a "SEARCH" command that contains a charset specification. If an IMAP server receives such a "SEARCH" command in that situation, it SHOULD reject the command with a "BAD" response (due to the conflicting charset labels). This also applies to any IMAP command or extension that includes an optional charset label and associated strings in the command arguments, including the MULTISEARCH extension. For commands with a mandatory charset field, such as SORT and THREAD, servers SHOULD reject charset values other than UTF-8 with a âBADâ response (due to the conflicting charset labels). Notes ----- This is a straightforward extrapolation of the existing text, but a literal reading of the existing text is silent about how to deal with this situation. -------------------------------------- RFC6855 (draft-ietf-eai-5738bis-12) -------------------------------------- Title : IMAP Support for UTF-8 Publication Date : March 2013 Author(s) : P. Resnick, Ed., C. Newman, Ed., S. Shen, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Email Address Internationalization Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6855 (4029) RFC Errata System
- Re: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6855 (40… Barry Leiba
- Re: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6855 (40… John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6855 (40… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [EAI] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6855 (40… Martin J. Dürst
- [EAI] [Errata Verified] RFC6855 (4029) RFC Errata System
- [EAI] [Errata Verified] RFC6855 (4029) RFC Errata System