Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-mailinglistbis-00.txt

["John Levine" <[e-mail]>]

>|  For more information, see [listheaders].
>
>Pointer apparently AWOL.

Bug in xml2rfc.  They know about it.

>| the list software might want to modify the VERP bounce
>| addresses to be ASCII.
>
>Please add an example.  At the moment VERP is "specified" in
>Wikipedia, maybe this draft could explain it for the IETF.

It's per-recipient bounce addresses that embed the recipient's
address.  For this doc, I don't see any need to describe it in more
detail.

>| Note that discussion on whether internationalized domain
>| names should be percent-encoded or puny-coded, is ongoing;
>| see [I-D.duerst-iri-bis].
>
>Please strike or replace this IRIbis detail, for the purpose
>of "legacy" (= existing) list tools only the "cannot punycode"
>interpretation makes sense, other <iregname> constructs, i.e.,
>stuff outside of LDH DNS, are not relevant for mailing lists.

But this isn't about legacy list tools.  It's about how list tools
might change to handle EAI mail.


>| Downgrading list headers
>
>Should that get a reference to the pop-imap-downgrade draft?

Dunno, what do other people think.

R's,
John