Re: [EAI] POP (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-05), SASLPrep, and Stringprep

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arnt Gulbrandsen" <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: <ima@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:22 AM
Subject: Re: [EAI] POP (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-05), SASLPrep, and 
Stringprep

>I think the substance of the requirements is fine.
>
> On 07/15/2012 05:49 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> (3) Or are we better off just leaving this alone and monitoring
>> any 4013bis efforts to make sure they contain provisions to
>> explicitly update our spec when the time comes?
>
> I'm sure some pedant will scan for 4013 references if/when 4013 is 
> updated, so let's just leverage that pedantry for our comfort.
>

I think that  adding the sentence similar to  "MUST conform to
4013 or one of its standards-track successors" is to help readers to look 
for the new version of rfc 4013, instead of depending on pedant tools only.
Since the new version of  rfc 4013 is very likely to come, I add the  " one 
of its standards-track successors" to the new version.

I think that it is a very small change.

Jiankang Yao

> Arnt
> (occasional pedant)
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
> 