Re: [EAI] [IETF] Content Issues [

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 16 October 2016 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FFD12947C for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iViqNgqeRoLS for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa3.jck.com (static-65-175-133-137.cpe.metrocast.net [65.175.133.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB65129473 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hp5.int.jck.com ([198.252.137.153] helo=JcK-HP5.jck.com) by bsa3.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1bvqKF-000JJy-Er; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:38:23 -0400
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:38:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <F50C675965DA3763DC98FBD1@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR03MB2813F3457E487F8948203D7682D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MWHPR03MB281341141A1CE0C0895F58A482D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <01Q668S03W0W00Q5OH@mauve.mrochek.com> <MWHPR03MB2813DA794DF0E1DEF36C8EC982D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <532EC6872314DFB0CC2B5F46@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <MWHPR03MB2813F3457E487F8948203D7682D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ima/VRLXDYQTAXBxAE4iMaAD-xyxS8A>
Cc: ima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [EAI] [IETF] Content Issues [
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ima/>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:38:32 -0000


--On Sunday, October 16, 2016 6:04 PM +0000 Shawn Steele
<Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>; wrote:

>> It seems to me that your current draft goes several steps
>> beyond that and toward best practices. 
> 
> You seem to have segued from my reply to the draft being
> discussed, so "your" appears to have changed meaning from the
> beginning to the end of the paragraph ;-)

Yes, it probably did.   "your" (actually both times) in the
paragraph you quote above was intended primarily for Harish and
Nalini as I indicated at the beginning rather than you (Shawn)
or anyone else specific.   Sorry for the confusion.  

Of course, I assume they would be happy to have help from you,
Ned, Yuriy, or anyone else on this list.

best,
    john