[EAI] draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt
fujiwara@jprs.co.jp Tue, 15 November 2011 02:12 UTC
Return-Path: <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE0B11E82F4 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:12:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+FDOEbcajB9 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from send11.jprs.co.jp (send11.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:8:6::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D932B11E82F3 for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sendsms11.jprs.co.jp (sendsms11.jprs.co.jp [202.11.17.111]) by send11.jprs.co.jp (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAF2C0hh025855 for <ima@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:12:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sendsms11.jprs.co.jp (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by sendsms11.jprs.co.jp (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A0036384A for <ima@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:12:00 +0900 (JST)
X-AuditID: ca0b116f-0000000a00002865-5e-4ec1ca6f1561
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:11:59 +0900
Message-Id: <20111115.111159.233706858.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
To: ima@ietf.org
From: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
In-Reply-To: <20111031152155.5832.21783.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20111031152155.5832.21783.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.50 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:12:02 -0000
Hi, all, I updated draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade to -03. This is changes from -02 and what I want to decide for future updates. same as http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/eai-1.pdf Please check the draft and diffs at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03 Changes from -02 to -03 are: 1. Added "Updates: 5322 (if approved)" in header "Section 3. Updating RFC 5322" already appeared in -02 2. Added Message-ID downgrading 3. Treated Unknown Header Fields as unstructured 4. Updated and fixed IANA considerations 5. Added one sentence to Security Considerations 6. Updated TYPED address downgrading 7. Updated the example 8. Some changes 2. Message-Id Downgrading RFC 5322 Section 3.6 describes that Min number of Message-Id, In-Reply-To, References, Resent-Message-Id fields is zero These header fields may be removed (with encapsulation) Defined new Downgraded header fields Downgraded-Message-Id, Downgraded-Resent-Message-Id Downgraded-In-Reply-To, Downgraded-References Defined Message-Id header downgrading as ENCAPSULATION Downgrading 3. Treated Unknown Header Fields as unstructured Previously, Unknown Header Fields was Encapsulated to new header field which field name is the concatenation of "Downgraded-" and the original name Downgraded-X-Unknown: RFC 5322 Section 3.6.8 "Optional Fields" says Field unspecified in this document is optional-field optional-field = field-name ":" unstructured CRLF Unknown Header Field Downgrading was changed as UNSTRUCTURED Downgrading Is this change OK ? 4. IANA considerations RFC 5504 defined many Downgraded header fields All of them are unused by recent standard track documents Update them to replace "experimental" with "obsoleted" and to reference this document (Or framework document ?) RFC 5504 requested refusing any "Downgraded-" registrations It may be useless, and new updating text required Added new 6 Downgraded- header fields Message-ID related and missed TYPED address headers Need more fixes 5. Secutiry Considerations Added one sentence Existing clients do not know new From: and Sender: header fields syntax updated by Section 3 and may get wrong when they confront<group> syntax in From: and Sender: fields. 6. Updated TYPED address downgrading Added missing header fields definition Downgraded-Original-Recipient: Downgraded-Final-Recipient: TODO Commented by Chairs, but no time to update to -03 Updating header fields definition and IANA Considerations Compatible to RFC 5504 Compatible with IANA Registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html New IANA request format I have new proposal <addr-spec> is downgraded as "Internationalized Address" ENCODED-WORD "Removed:;" May I change it as ENCODED-WORD ":;" ? Reason It's easy and simple to implement People who need internationalization cannot understand "Internationalized Address removed". With/Without ""Internationalized Address removed", it is a group syntax and the receiver cannot reply. I want to make questions for WG members, 1. Is it OK that treating Unknown Header Fields as unstructured ? 2. Who obsoletes header fields defined by RFC 5504 ? (framework ? This document ?) 3. Is removing "Internationalized Address removed" OK ? Regards, -- Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Email Address Internationalization Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Post-delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages > Author(s) : Kazunori Fujiwara > Filename : draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt > Pages : 19 > Date : 2011-10-31 > > The Email Address Internationalization (UTF8SMTP) extension allows > UTF-8 characters in mail header fields. POP and IMAP servers support > internationalized email messages. If a POP/IMAP client does not > support Email Address Internationalization, POP/IMAP servers cannot > send Internationalized Email Headers to the client and cannot remove > the message. To avoid the situation, this document describes a > conversion mechanism for internationalized Email messages to be > traditional message format. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt > _______________________________________________ > IMA mailing list > IMA@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima >
- [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrad… internet-drafts
- [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt fujiwara
- Re: [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt Frank Ellermann
- Re: [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-03.txt Frank Ellermann