Re: [EAI] WG Last Call to RFC5721bis

Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Tue, 20 December 2011 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A543411E80CA for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:21:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YjacmhL+AFAW for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBAB11E80C5 for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms5.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.111] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1Rcs8s-0004Zj-4N for ima@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:21:34 +0000
Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1Rcs8s-0002qK-3a for ima@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:21:34 +0000
Received: by qcso15 with SMTP id o15so3514516qcs.9 for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.137.77 with SMTP id v13mr170006qct.136.1324358493537; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.107] (75-119-229-252.dsl.teksavvy.com. [75.119.229.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dk9sm1385643qab.0.2011.12.19.21.21.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
In-Reply-To: <4EE3D60F.3030009@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:21:30 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7AA90B49-7248-400D-920C-0B45A402E7F3@afilias.info>
References: <49A44A8C-80D0-4368-887A-1C78AA76D005@afilias.info> <4EE3D60F.3030009@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "ima@ietf.org WG" <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] WG Last Call to RFC5721bis
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:21:37 -0000

On 2011-12-10, at 4:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> On 18/11/2011 08:11, Joseph Yee wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Following from working group discussion in IETF82, we are initiating a WG Last Call on draft,
>> draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-03, with termination date of Nov 25, 1pm Eastern Time / 17:00 UTC.
> Hi,
> I am very sorry for being so late with my review, but I thought you might appreciate my comments.
> 
> I think the document is well written and is ready for advancement to Proposed Standard. I only found a couple of nits:
> 
> 6.  IANA Considerations
> 
>   This specification updates two capabilities ("UTF8" and "LANG") to
>   the POP3 capability registry [RFC2449].
> 
>   This specification also adds one new response code ("UTF-8") to the
>   POP3 response codes registry [RFC2449].
> 
> I think adding a pointer to section 5 where the new response code is
> defined would be good here, as it will help IANA to locate the necessary
> information.
> 
> The document has 2 Informative References sections:
> 
> 9.2.  Informative References
> 9.3.  Informative References
> 
> They should be merged into 1.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
> 


Hi,

Additional nits on top of what Alexey pointed out:

(1)
"Obsoletes: 5721" instead of "Obsoletes: RFC5721"

(2)
Section 1 Introduction - 4th paragraph
"down-conversion" was explained for the rest of the draft, but the actual term used through out the draft is "down-convert".  "down-conversion" shown up only twice in the draft, and shown in the same paragraph.  This draft needs to replace "down-conversion" with "down-convert".


As Alexey says, I believed that this draft is ready.  After the revision, it should be one down, two to go.

Thanks
Joseph