Re: [EAI] [IETF] Content Issues [

Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> Sun, 16 October 2016 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040141294B4 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIxgOccOVshe for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B9B1294B9 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=pUoS6UQVIIf+ZGCpq86r/5/k81LCX4Ykb2VRPrjgjV0=; b=E+p4W48i5iXTTsB2xxP/GcmMJTEMjxCJZnStunb+zt/9TDRfNavRbwLqdvZabIWCzLH2QMa+99oW1b8Y9i413gH9nrEur9qglSWbc7pbSO8+HC2Ew2Nm2zBMzKHEjngxrpzZcDY8m536wnb6U4SVUnHQntRSKp67P94nzffaPiU=
Received: from MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.175.135.7) by MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.175.135.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.659.11; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:04:01 +0000
Received: from MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.175.135.7]) by MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.175.135.7]) with mapi id 15.01.0659.025; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:04:01 +0000
From: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Thread-Topic: [EAI] [IETF] Content Issues [
Thread-Index: AdInSGoNlaqwg5dxQCSUup0Iyls68gAbauUzAAM7yRAAA8eKgAABUzlg
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:04:01 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR03MB2813F3457E487F8948203D7682D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MWHPR03MB281341141A1CE0C0895F58A482D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <01Q668S03W0W00Q5OH@mauve.mrochek.com> <MWHPR03MB2813DA794DF0E1DEF36C8EC982D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <532EC6872314DFB0CC2B5F46@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <532EC6872314DFB0CC2B5F46@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.35.76.48]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ba17e935-8f8d-465e-4061-08d3f5eecf09
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR03MB2813; 7:97PYy9AZrTYEeCFYPsD0ojN6jFVpoG8sRXmlHCDzTjXs3zSSH8V91eiuMrR9+MQFpM/jCRS7hT/B3WldaaTcTwmYMXW1XS5bF64FfLHBEsE8PgYZ/2Gi8/vkPRrt2Ld8QNavUR8p9FM/KXUgT7IiQJUS54rgBvfFsogqz/VNA6vWKR80EIiqqsdCuIsZ7Zmn48iPFi4/84pB5dHj+3flut7M/ccQOyNoZF0xfAyHfPtDroT2nyo7eifrXvBXcOPoGKCrQfp9xanNm2VB4/+ImCVM618ZtIyuMf3Uh3tZX6qkCreYZUmbOf2+iMsmhlFFmv+xtkGGS/hX+FjVqJLKCw3Yh//SaQ21cHB+GYoE7YXw8PsDzUZwhxGEu4UfISpb
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MWHPR03MB2813;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR03MB281338AF9CF01A5ADA22671882D10@MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:MWHPR03MB2813; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR03MB2813;
x-forefront-prvs: 00979FCB3A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(97736004)(305945005)(7846002)(74316002)(2950100002)(6916009)(2906002)(11100500001)(33656002)(68736007)(10290500002)(105586002)(7736002)(8990500004)(76576001)(99286002)(122556002)(76176999)(586003)(54356999)(8936002)(50986999)(101416001)(189998001)(77096005)(5005710100001)(92566002)(4326007)(10400500002)(66066001)(3280700002)(81156014)(5002640100001)(81166006)(3660700001)(7696004)(110136003)(9686002)(87936001)(106356001)(2900100001)(5660300001)(558084003)(10090500001)(86362001)(8676002)(6116002)(102836003)(3846002)(93886004)(86612001)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR03MB2813; H:MWHPR03MB2813.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Oct 2016 18:04:01.2182 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR03MB2813
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ima/jr7vPitDumIgu7pl35W3rNHmMo0>
Cc: "ima@ietf.org" <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] [IETF] Content Issues [
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ima/>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:04:04 -0000

> It seems to me that your current draft goes several steps beyond that and toward best practices. 

You seem to have segued from my reply to the draft being discussed, so "your" appears to have changed meaning from the beginning to the end of the paragraph ;-)

-Shawn