IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02

Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Fri, 13 July 2012 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41FF11E80D2 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.784, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6iOlqfK9j7zP for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F4011E8097 for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms6.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.112] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1SplHX-0005mL-5N for ima@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:12:03 +0000
Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1SplHX-0000dW-7x for ima@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:12:03 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id m8so2663268vcd.9 for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=zezNbR7txoq33h1F/g9oD8k3uWP0G7uNv13wgCWMbac=; b=i2NEcJ3PrKmmVZjqtiiSmkKqqAOWsHCvbLjUIdVMnhxcGDjbGohX6uzGiWASs+K4AW 9z2rK0ssZfQcSj0klspj7gwD+9q3Q0czjdPVcRRtlymdgifvrRlbsr1Ms+c8/veBcg29 juyNdVr1pqVPtx8Ym3fNc7toVP4rkmwGLfOBlOYi7Qy5/CjqxabpOBTFsPyylI6x1yQL AxH2eRiQbSaPMZ5GEU8kSabAl8dgXZ7gAImEKf4v5+BRmbL27S1n48NarJ7DWgQDFQh/ FyrMouqycQ1+aeiCWSHgs5ic50BYj3eTtSk8FG2W97rm4cE2HmxDkggygG/mnVoycsYk kj+g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.198 with SMTP id c6mr1130098vcp.54.1342206723244; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.158.34 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207130934580.95156@joyce.lan>
References: <CAF1dMVE+2_288HmqaFfqANyB1r+KzBYXQ37i0_Gm_x1w1COqVw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121737350.66870@joyce.lan> <B693E26DE56016D0E4FE6295@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50000609.4020509@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207130934580.95156@joyce.lan>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:12:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF1dMVHAjKYa8CUM9EjhsaaFKWN=3ebmd0bAxOqQeBvNEx6a3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0438ee5bf4415104c4badab4"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqcQheJKwe0Z1gjLYVU9gPN1Q38eSi6Q/84cCF6urNx/W/npUGHSwhf7faBGX/79n+mMDQ
Cc: EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:11:28 -0000

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Also, my proposal of different text for the "%-routing problem", which is
>> clearer about the source of the problem, in particular that it's an
>> implementation problem (correct escaping/unescaping) and not an a-priori
>> problem, hasn't been taken into account, and I don't know why.
>>
>
> I looked at your language, and it seemed to me less clear than what's
> there.  The problem is very simple, some MTAs mishandle addresses that
> contain % signs.  All we need to do is note it, not tell people how we
> think they should fix it or work around it.
>
>
> <thought type="personal">

Agreed that describing how to manage % sign is out of scope for this
document, but noting it helps readers.

</>
Joseph


> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
> ______________________________**_________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/ima<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status