IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Sat, 14 July 2012 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642DC21F85AD for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDYKCYSuWOKu for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A637621F8568 for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q6E2EGcg011997 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:14:16 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 4aaf_59b2_9d0eda74_cd59_11e1_824c_001d096c566a; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:14:16 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:41386) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S15E1F47> for <ima@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:14:19 +0900
Message-ID: <5000D5F1.8000909@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:14:09 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <CAF1dMVE+2_288HmqaFfqANyB1r+KzBYXQ37i0_Gm_x1w1COqVw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121737350.66870@joyce.lan> <5000022C.5020207@isode.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207130936460.95156@joyce.lan> <50003A2A.5080005@isode.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207131111440.95156@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207131111440.95156@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:13:40 -0000

On 2012/07/14 0:34, John R Levine wrote:

> My. there's a can of worms. We don't reference RFC 6531 for SMTPUTF8,
> 6532 for non-ASCII headers, 5322 for the From, Reply-To, and Sender
> headers, 5598 for MTA, MDA, and MUA, or 20 for ASCII.
>
> RFC 3986, which we do reference, describes all of the URI schemes that
> we mention.

Small detail, maybe relevant, maybe not: RFC 3986 only describes the 
general syntax of URIs. It does not define individual schemes. The last 
time general URI syntax and individual schemes were described in the 
same spec was in RFC 1738, which is two generations ago (with RFC 2396 
in between).

> It probably would be a good idea to reference 6531 and 6532, though.

Yes indeed.

Regards,   Martin.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status