Re: Communciator 4.02 Imap EXPUNGE problem

Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu> Tue, 26 August 1997 21:25 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa16878; 26 Aug 97 17:25 EDT
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid RAA08039 for <ietf-archive@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 17:28:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP id OAA22449; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 14:19:34 -0700
Received: from mx4.u.washington.edu (mx4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.5]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id OAA32254 for <imap@lists.u.washington.edu>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 14:19:00 -0700
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by mx4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id OAA19526 for <imap@u.washington.edu>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 14:18:58 -0700
Received: from mailhost1.cac.washington.edu (mailhost1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id OAA28427 for <imap@CAC.Washington.EDU>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 14:18:56 -0700
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (pat@tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58]) by mailhost1.cac.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.07) with SMTP id OAA00802; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 14:18:53 -0700
Message-Id: <MailManager.872630045.19274.mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 14:14:05 -0700
Sender: IMAP-owner@u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
To: "Barry Leiba, Multimedia Messaging" <leiba@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: imap <imap@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Communciator 4.02 Imap EXPUNGE problem
In-Reply-To: <SIMEON.9708261612.C@uranus.diz.watson.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
X-Sender: Mark Crispin <mrc@tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 26 Aug 1997 16:48:12 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Barry Leiba,
Multimedia Messaging wrote:
> No doubt some of it will.  I'm hoping, though, that more of it will be
> along the line of
> * beware of making this assumption; some servers do not support it,
> * beware of doing this or that with the protocol; in some configurations
>   it's dangerous,
> * be sure to consider this or that, because we've seen problems with it.

I wonder if it wouldn't be better instead to have a specific description of
what is a *minimum* compliant server, and specify that clients must
interoperate with it.

It might also be useful to conjure a "evil" server implementation that screws
the client every chance it gets (e.g. "LIST *" causes 100,000 randomly
generated names to be returned, CREATE/DELETE/RENAME all return NO, INBOX has
10,000 messages,...