Re: re: FETCH command behavior
Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu> Wed, 27 August 1997 01:28 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa20746; 26 Aug 97 21:28 EDT
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid VAA08785 for <ietf-archive@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:31:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP id SAA12287; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:26:50 -0700
Received: from mx2.u.washington.edu (mx2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id SAA45932 for <imap@lists.u.washington.edu>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:26:14 -0700
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mx2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id SAA20756 for <imap@u.washington.edu>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:26:13 -0700
Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id SAA22487 for <imap@CAC.Washington.EDU>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:26:11 -0700
Received: from mail.goamerica.net by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: johnny5.goamerica.net [206.138.237.22]) id QQdein17224; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:25:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ga03cp01.goamerica.net by mail.goamerica.net (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id VAA12616; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:20:57 -0400
Received: by ga03cp01.goamerica.net (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4/AirBoss) id VAA09112; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:24:21 -0400
Message-Id: <199708270124.VAA09112@ga03cp01.goamerica.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:24:09 -0700
Reply-To: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
Sender: IMAP-owner@u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
To: Larry Osterman <LarryO@exchange.microsoft.com>
Cc: 'IMAP List' <imap@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: re: FETCH command behavior
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-From: "Mark Crispin" <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
>Feelings on the part of the other interested parties? If we have concensus, >then Mark, can you take it as an editorial point to relax the wording (or >explicitly put in wording to allow this) in the next revision of 2060? I'd >hate to decide that this was an ok thing too do and then have some client >implementor decide that they CAN depend on this behavior.... I think that it is reasonable to assume that a client would not depend upon the server not working. ;-)
- FETCH command behavior Larry Osterman (Exchange)
- re: FETCH command behavior Mark Crispin
- re: FETCH command behavior Larry Osterman
- Re: re: FETCH command behavior Mark Crispin
- RE: FETCH command behavior Mark Crispin