Re: Concerning the FETCH command
Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com> Wed, 27 August 1997 16:18 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa08908; 27 Aug 97 12:18 EDT
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid MAA10609 for <ietf-archive@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP id JAA26990; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:12:26 -0700
Received: from mx2.u.washington.edu (mx2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id JAA46262 for <imap@lists.u.washington.edu>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:12:02 -0700
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by mx2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id JAA02961 for <imap@u.washington.edu>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:11:59 -0700
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM (SYSTEM@THOR.INNOSOFT.COM [192.160.253.66]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id JAA15649 for <imap@cac.washington.edu>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:11:56 -0700
Received: from eleanor.innosoft.com ("port 41452"@ELEANOR.INNOSOFT.COM) by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.1-10 #8694) with SMTP id <01IMXGDYN2DG94F4AH@INNOSOFT.COM> for imap@cac.washington.edu; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:10:48 PDT
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970827090919.2282D-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:12:45 -0700
Sender: IMAP-owner@u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>
To: Michael Groeger <Michael.Groeger@brokat.de>
Cc: IMAP Discusson List <imap@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Concerning the FETCH command
In-Reply-To: <3403FF2F.1BB65F61@Brokat.De>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Michael Groeger wrote: > Yes, me again > well, first thanks to Mark Keasling for the detailed help on my last > request, > but now I have another problem... > I am trying <FETCH RFC822> and the server returns > <BAD Missing required argument to FETCH>. > > Can anybody help me with this problem? See RFC 2060 for a description of what's wrong. HTML: <http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc2060.html> or Text: <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2060.txt> - Chris
- Concerning the FETCH command Michael Groeger
- Re: Concerning the FETCH command Chris Newman