re: Sorting Extension - was Re: IMAP4: reordered mailbox during session

Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu> Wed, 27 August 1997 19:12 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11934; 27 Aug 97 15:12 EDT
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid PAA11346 for <ietf-archive@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP id MAA05480; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 12:07:05 -0700
Received: from mx2.u.washington.edu (mx2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id MAA32310 for <imap@lists.u.washington.edu>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 12:06:45 -0700
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (laporta@tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58]) by mx2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with ESMTP id MAA18918 for <imap@u.washington.edu>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 12:06:44 -0700
Message-Id: <MailManager.872708610.342.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 12:03:30 -0700
Sender: IMAP-owner@u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
To: Cyrus Daboo <daboo@cyrusoft.com>
Cc: imap@u.washington.edu, Steve Hole <steve@esys.ca>
Subject: re: Sorting Extension - was Re: IMAP4: reordered mailbox during session
In-Reply-To: <462163.3081669966@sardis.cyrusoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
X-Sender: Mark Crispin <mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 27 Aug 1997 11:26:06 -0400, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> What is the status (if any) of the server side sorting extenions proposal?
> I Ask this in reference to the thread (partially quoted below) about
> messages being copied into mailboxes and always appearing at the end of
> the mailbox. Presumably, if a server side sort is enabled for the mailbox
> in question, the message may sort to some other location. The question is
> whether the action of sorting is initiated by the client, or whether the
> server will keep a mailbox sorted as new messages are copied into it.
> Presumably such issues are addressed in the SORT proposal?

I am busily writing code for SORT now.

SORT will not change any ordering in the mailbox, but rather will give you a
list of sequences (or UIDs) in the requested sort order (e.g. by date,
subject, etc.).

I don't know if this is what you are thinking about.