Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Thu, 16 February 2012 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F89821F8628 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:24:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K+FROYblbE7k for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [80.244.248.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6E321F861D for <imap5@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43370F8C930; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:24:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1329423886-12558-12558/10/24; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:24:46 +0000
Message-Id: <4F3D6632.1080803@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:25:22 +0100
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: imap5@ietf.org
References: <B764BD8C8B6047E659EABBE2@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4F397212.1030107@qbik.com> <20120213210805.GB13029@launde.brong.net> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202151405550.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <1329315552.1444.140661036879893@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4F3BBFA4.8010107@isode.com> <1329316981.8310.140661036883625@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4F3BC7DA.5070803@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <20120215181047.GB13906@launde.brong.net> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1202151020140.38441@hsinghsing.panda.com> <20120215213122.GB16253@launde.brong.net> <4F3C2C1B.6030408@qbik.com> <3077.1329344733.342803@puncture> <4F3CA887.9050509@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <307.1329382177.374908@puncture> <4F3CCA6C.3020004@qbik.com> <3077.1329386263.642278@puncture> <1329386650.31621.140661037282969@webmail.messagingengine.com> <3077.1329387922.639535@puncture> <340DCA8DBA39E16EA1E0835C@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <340DCA8DBA39E16EA1E0835C@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:24:50 -0000

On 02/16/2012 04:34 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Not in the least is the simple issue of even getting SRV from standard
> DNS libraries (e.g. one Android developer mentioned that the size of his
> app increased significantly when he had to bring in libraries to do SRV).

The code they're complaining about was ported to android by me, and I
must say that the code isn't at all optimised for that use case. It
wouldn't be too difficult to strip out about 95% of the code and leave a
simple DNS query library.

I didn't care enough to do it, and I observe that neither did the
developer you spoke to.

Arnt