Re: [imap5] Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 16 February 2012 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF27021F879D for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:06:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJzgB4lPOXBg for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2A321F8786 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:06:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:43440) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Ry12J-00039f-Sx (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:12 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1Ry12J-0007lC-To (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:11 +0000
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:11 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
In-Reply-To: <1329396103.8954.140661037328961@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202161305220.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <833EE8EEE88E4ADE5CDDDADB@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4F3835A1.7060804@qbik.com> <B764BD8C8B6047E659EABBE2@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4F397212.1030107@qbik.com> <20120213210805.GB13029@launde.brong.net> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202151405550.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk><1329315552.1444.140661036879893@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4F3BBFA4.8010107@isode.com> <1329316981.8310.140661036883625@webmail.messagingengine.com> <66F68487BF0EED4BA7D767E2410F30B3EFF259456A@FRSPX100.fr01.awl.atosorigin.net><20120215211301.GA16253@launde.brong.net> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202161126410.31357@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <1329396103.8954.140661037328961@webmail.messagingengine.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [imap5] Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:06:19 -0000

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> Not really.  Existing servers would be a lot more efficient with a query
> which limited to a single "folder", for sure - because they could optimise
> it.  But it's no different than an SQL query across a partitioned table.
> It means your in-memory-state needs to be big enough to accommodate all
> the mailboxes that might be in the regular searches, of course.

Have you seen UW-IMAP's in-memory state? :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
South Biscay: Northerly or northeasterly, veering easterly or northeasterly 3
or 4. Slight or moderate. Mainly fair. Moderate or good.