Re: [imap5] Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP

Thomas Koch <thomas@koch.ro> Thu, 09 February 2012 07:20 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas@koch.ro>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDFA21F85B4 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:20:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.51
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_RO=1.235, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556, HOST_EQ_RO=0.904]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5K82RZUqsgss for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from koch.ro (koch.ro [88.198.2.104]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1A321F853A for <imap5@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 43-172.77-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.77.172.43] helo=t61.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <thomas@koch.ro>) id 1RvOJ3-0002cX-0q; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:20:37 +0100
From: Thomas Koch <thomas@koch.ro>
To: imap5@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:20:27 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <1328732126.32086.140661033971485@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1328732126.32086.140661033971485@webmail.messagingengine.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201202090820.28260.thomas@koch.ro>
Cc: ietf-imapext@imc.org, IMAP Protocol Interest List <imap-protocol@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: [imap5] Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:20:41 -0000

Bron Gondwana:
> Snide comments from those who don't agree with the goals are welcome too...
> I just won't listen to you.  These goals are very important to me.
Hi Bron,

I'm not an expert in IMAP, just got here out of curiosity about Kolab[1]'s use 
of IMAP folders as data stores.
I found some older initiatives to replace IMAP with an HTTP based approach.[2] 
What do you think of HTTP for mail access? For my bachelor thesis[3] I 
currently argue that CardDAV/CalDAV could be perfectly replaced by AtomPub 
(RFC 5023).
The main advantage would be that most software developers on this planet have 
some vague understanding of HTTP and that imense infrastructure and software 
already exists.

[1] http://wiki.kolab.org/Why_IMAP_Is_Used_For_Storage
[2] http://www.prescod.net/rest/restmail/
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpmail
[3] https://github.com/thkoch2001/bachelor-thesis

Best regards,

Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro