Re: [imap5] Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Thu, 09 February 2012 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D439221F8466 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:32:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0Wli9m2lTPM for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C89E21F86EE for <imap5@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0683E209A8 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 06:32:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:32:10 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=wPCn9RtD+I2RGzRY5ggh/VUe mtU=; b=Gbr3CvUxKMNaThkEvyic5Oq5+9OcqBQcSlwN37QLthMcsBeG3p+iPHTk QJDgK6n8ioJ5n80LOntvgVBKDbqkvkXFWmFSPsKW2fk0GOqU78Jnl1XgH9MW3biV 2zPn2VFN9PZ1SbmGXPFjOOJLMHAZNJ7gFPR5OZdhaSJnPwO73ec=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=wPCn9RtD+I2RGzRY5ggh/VUemtU=; b=AmuL2A2HKAkyqSjv4v9gqaDqkqI/ knnqmOnIzrzbmHyd7JVeks6wdkL73KodYdunG43A+Gmin2r0BO84+ozqfmu6Y1D8 KiC+VOrF/29YminiWVyu6P/o6vW8w10NxsE1LhFaZmq6YuO7l5ISsL6fZp2xjxkz y2fasYKE3tk+Ms0=
X-Sasl-enc: t+LLM2k4dsiT7QwkYEiqOLrfMqwb1O0wfKAnksCsqsBx 1328787129
Received: from localhost (99.249.9.46.customer.cdi.no [46.9.249.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF14D8E0085; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 06:32:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 380351C6FBC; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:32:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:32:08 +0100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
To: Giovanni Panozzo <giovanni@panozzo.it>
Message-ID: <20120209113208.GA31355@launde.brong.net>
References: <1328732126.32086.140661033971485@webmail.messagingengine.com> <201202090820.28260.thomas@koch.ro> <4F33AD2D.7050904@panozzo.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F33AD2D.7050904@panozzo.it>
Organization: brong.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: ietf-imapext@imc.org, imap5@ietf.org, imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: [imap5] Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:32:21 -0000

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:25:33PM +0100, Giovanni Panozzo wrote:
> PS: I think that crossposting in 3 ML is too much. Which one will be
> the official ML for this discussion ?

(posting to all three for this...)

Let's take the rest of the traffic to just imap5@ietf.org

Bron.