IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP

Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com> Mon, 20 February 2012 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <filip.navara@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389FE21F8757 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_84=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10qW75yrxwqM for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCF921F8755 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbwd15 with SMTP id wd15so8296296obb.31 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of filip.navara@gmail.com designates 10.182.75.102 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.75.102;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of filip.navara@gmail.com designates 10.182.75.102 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=filip.navara@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=filip.navara@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.75.102]) by 10.182.75.102 with SMTP id b6mr13534840obw.9.1329746713495 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+e1hvhVFWW370VvLIld3Fxb3Vi3x2BfSQmzNmcX5jN0=; b=UP0UXUNF4Z4HCCueo67sPt+phQzApMPu2McspcDUxIgV1Y9YIA8SPZo3aQ7sGyttK6 nTLOQkoihr6M63pmU5+aByliOSWr9EpMyw1T9bSvT0xkFwX4kC8aYSRG/SBE9Sx69tDi 2YnVQVJ7LEddiZVFB5kDbW1byUN/bbK2+iXyA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.75.102 with SMTP id b6mr11480947obw.9.1329746713043; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.74.8 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:05:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1329743631.12698.140661038857849@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202161626400.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4F3D6E57.8010301@qbik.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202171127330.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4F3F4F8F.3040601@qbik.com> <1329550573.30138.140661038121885@webmail.messagingengine.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202191832430.12769@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20120219192604.GA11323@launde.brong.net> <4F415C07.3040100@qbik.com> <20120219220835.GB12549@launde.brong.net> <4F417EF5.6030809@qbik.com> <20120219233901.GA13600@launde.brong.net> <4F41952B.8020809@qbik.com> <1329738117.22774.140661038826265@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4F423CE4.5060103@qbik.com> <CAD8HnzwaaHjPTwsze0ACOTgPdEUgyrJZ62CDyasxE0eKd8rDcA@mail.gmail.com> <1329743631.12698.140661038857849@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:05:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD8HnzzffVCy-DC=QzOJMPe5ZAwuVPqMVSferADG=_B3xy5omg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae93994a978e1bb04b965c85d"
Cc: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:05:18 -0000

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, at 01:43 PM, Filip Navara wrote:
> > JYFI, we (eM Client, www.emclient.com) do use BURL in some cases.
> >
> > F.
>
> How do you handle BCC?


We don't use BURL for mails with BCC. In theory we could use CHUNKING+BURL,
but we never implemented it.

F.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email